Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Clin Chem. 2011 Mar;57(3):441-8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.152553. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] assays are characterized by poor between-assay comparability. This result emphasizes the need for reference measurement procedures (RMPs) to establish calibration traceability and assist in method validation. We aimed at developing candidate RMPs on the basis of isotope- dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) for separate quantification of serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3.
Hexa-deuterated 25(OH)D3/D2 was added to serum. This mixture was extracted with n-hexane and fractionated on Sephadex LH-20 before 2-dimensional LC-MS/MS. In the first dimension, both procedures used a C4 column; however, in the second dimension, the 25(OH)D2 procedure used a C18 and the 25(OH)D3 procedure used a Zorbax SB-CN column. Calibration was traceable to the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2972. Validation comprised assessment of interference and limit of quantification/detection. Imprecision and trueness were validated by analysis of the SRM 972 against specifications (CV<5% and bias<1.7%). The expanded uncertainty for quadruplicate measurements was estimated.
Testing of potentially interfering substances was negative. Interference by 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was resolved by sufficient chromatographic resolution. The limits of quantification/detection were 1.1 nmol/L and 0.09 pmol/L for 25(OH)D3 and 1.2 nmol/L and 0.05 pmol/L for 25(OH)D(2). Mean total CVs and differences from the SRM 972 target (±1-sided 95% CI) were 2.1% and 1.1%±1.5% [25(OH)D3] and 3% and 1.3%±0.6% [25(OH)D2], respectively. The respective expanded uncertainties were 3.4% and 3.9%.
From the validation data, we conclude that we achieved our objective of 2 state-of-the-art candidate RMPs for serum 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2.
25-羟维生素 D [25(OH)D]检测方法之间的可比性较差。这一结果强调需要参考测量程序(RMP)来建立校准溯源性,并协助方法验证。我们旨在基于同位素稀释液相色谱-串联质谱法(ID-LC-MS/MS)为单独定量血清 25(OH)D2 和 25(OH)D3 开发候选 RMP。
在血清中加入六氘代 25(OH)D3/D2。用正己烷提取该混合物,用 Sephadex LH-20 进行分级,然后进行二维 LC-MS/MS。在第一维中,两种方法均使用 C4 柱;然而,在第二维中,25(OH)D2 方法使用 C18 柱,25(OH)D3 方法使用 Zorbax SB-CN 柱。校准可追溯至 NIST 标准参考物质(SRM)2972。验证包括对干扰和定量/检测限的评估。通过分析 SRM 972 与规格(CV<5%和偏差<1.7%)的比较来验证精密度和准确度。对重复测量的四个扩展不确定度进行了估计。
对潜在干扰物质的测试结果为阴性。通过充分的色谱分辨率解决了 3-epi-25(OH)D3 的干扰问题。25(OH)D3 和 25(OH)D2 的定量/检测限分别为 1.1 nmol/L 和 0.09 pmol/L 和 1.2 nmol/L 和 0.05 pmol/L。平均总 CVs 和与 SRM 972 目标值的差异(±1 侧 95%置信区间)分别为 2.1%和 1.1%±1.5%[25(OH)D3]和 3%和 1.3%±0.6%[25(OH)D2]。相应的扩展不确定度分别为 3.4%和 3.9%。
从验证数据可以得出结论,我们实现了为血清 25(OH)D3 和 25(OH)D2 分别建立 2 个最先进的候选 RMP 的目标。