Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):532-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.042. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation after an intrastromal femtosecond laser procedure to treat presbyopia using a theoretic approach.
International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nonrandomized clinical trial.
Preoperatively and 12 months after intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment (IntraCor) of presbyopia, biometry was performed by partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). The postoperative keratometry (K) values and IOL power calculation formulas (Holladay I, Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q) were compared with results derived from the clinical history method, taking the manifest refraction change into account.
The study enrolled 25 patients (median age 54 years). Three eyes were excluded for age-related lens changes. The median spherical equivalent change in the other 22 eyes was -0.38 diopter (D). The median difference in K values between the clinical history method and PCI was -0.21 D, resulting in a median IOL power difference between -0.23 D (SRK/T) and -0.29 D (Haigis) (range -1.58 to +1.00 D). The IOL power was underestimated in 59.1% of cases with the Hoffer Q and 63.6% of cases with the Holladay I, Haigis, and SRK/T. There was a difference of ±0.75 D in 72.7% of eyes using the Holladay I, Haigis, and Hoffer Q and in 86.4% of eyes using the SRK/T. Neither K values nor IOL power differences were statistically significant (P > .17).
Intraocular lens power calculation using modern standard formulas incorporated in a PCI biometry device after intrastromal femtosecond presbyopia treatment was reliable, with minimum underestimation on average.
评估理论方法在经间质飞秒激光治疗老视的眼内透镜(IOL)屈光力计算的准确性。
德国海德堡大学眼科国际视力矫正研究中心。
非随机临床试验。
在经间质飞秒激光治疗(IntraCor)老视术前和术后 12 个月,使用部分相干干涉测量法(IOLMaster)进行生物测量。术后角膜曲率(K)值和 IOL 屈光力计算公式(Holladay I、Haigis、SRK/T、Hoffer Q)与考虑到明显的屈光度变化的临床病史法的结果进行比较。
该研究纳入了 25 名患者(中位年龄 54 岁)。3 只眼因年龄相关性晶状体改变而被排除。其余 22 只眼的中位等效球镜变化为-0.38 屈光度(D)。临床病史法与 PCI 之间 K 值的中位差异为-0.21 D,导致 IOL 屈光力差异中位数为-0.23 D(SRK/T)和-0.29 D(Haigis)(范围-1.58 至+1.00 D)。Hoffer Q 中 59.1%的病例和 Haigis、Holladay I 和 SRK/T 中 63.6%的病例低估了 IOL 屈光力。Holladay I、Haigis 和 Hoffer Q 中 72.7%的眼和 SRK/T 中 86.4%的眼的屈光力差异为±0.75 D。K 值和 IOL 屈光力差异均无统计学意义(P>.17)。
在经间质飞秒激光治疗老视后,使用现代标准公式在 PCI 生物测量仪中进行 IOL 屈光力计算是可靠的,平均而言,低估程度最小。