Fitting A, Ehmer A, Rabsilber T M, Auffarth G U, Holzer M P
International Vision Correction Research Centre, Univ.-Augenklinik, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Ophthalmologe. 2011 Sep;108(9):852-8. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2398-6.
The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy of autorefraction measurements in patients after INTRACOR intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment of presbyopia by comparing the agreement between the subjective and objective refraction.
In this study the data of 19 patients with a mean age of 56.5±6.0 years following INTRACOR treatment were analyzed pre-operatively and 12 months postoperatively. Measurements of the subjective refraction and the results of the autorefractor Nidek-660A in miosis were compared. INTRACOR is a refractive intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment to correct presbyopia. During the procedure a series of five concentric rings in the central stroma are cut which cause a change in the curvature of the cornea.
The differences in sphere and spherical equivalent between subjective refraction and autorefraction were not significant (t-test p>0.05 and Wilcoxon test p>0.05). Comparing the cylinder of the two measurements a significant difference (t-test p<0.05) was found. Focusing on the difference of the postoperative measurements of the subjective refraction and autorefraction a correlation (within ±0.5 D) of 89% in the sphere, 100% in cylinder and 68% in the spherical equivalent was detected. With one exception the differences in sphere, cylinder and the spherical equivalent were within ±1.25 D. In several patients the performance of the autorefraction with the Nidek-660A was somewhat complicated and the measures had to be repeated frequently.
The agreement between subjective refraction and objective measurements of the Nidek-660A of patients following INTRACOR-treatment was good. However there was a significant difference in the cylinder values. Therefore thorough comparison of measurements obtained with the autorefractor and the subjective refraction is recommended.
本研究的目的是通过比较主观验光和客观验光之间的一致性,确定在进行INTRACOR基质内飞秒激光治疗老花眼的患者中自动验光测量的准确性。
本研究分析了19例平均年龄为56.5±6.0岁的患者在接受INTRACOR治疗术前及术后12个月的数据。比较了主观验光测量结果和在瞳孔缩小情况下使用Nidek-660A自动验光仪的测量结果。INTRACOR是一种用于矫正老花眼的基质内飞秒激光屈光治疗。在手术过程中,在中央基质层切割一系列五个同心环,这会导致角膜曲率发生变化。
主观验光和自动验光在球镜度数和等效球镜度数上的差异不显著(t检验p>0.05,Wilcoxon检验p>0.05)。比较两种测量的柱镜度数,发现存在显著差异(t检验p<0.05)。关注主观验光和自动验光术后测量结果的差异,发现球镜度数的相关性为89%(±0.5 D以内),柱镜度数为100%,等效球镜度数为68%。除一例例外,球镜度数、柱镜度数和等效球镜度数的差异均在±1.25 D以内。在一些患者中,使用Nidek-660A进行自动验光的操作有些复杂,测量不得不频繁重复。
接受INTRACOR治疗的患者,主观验光与Nidek-660A客观测量结果之间的一致性良好。然而,柱镜度数存在显著差异。因此,建议对自动验光仪测量结果和主观验光结果进行全面比较。