• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评价充血性心力衰竭患者自体骨骼肌成肌细胞经皮心肌内移植的 IIa 期、随机、开放标签试验的最终结果:SEISMIC 试验。

Final results of a phase IIa, randomised, open-label trial to evaluate the percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in congestive heart failure patients: the SEISMIC trial.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):805-12. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A139.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV6I7A139
PMID:21252013
Abstract

AIMS

The SEISMIC study was an open-label, prospective, randomised study to assess the safety and feasibility of percutaneous myoblast implantation in heart failure patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were randomised 2:1 to autologous skeletal myoblast therapy vs. optimal medical treatment. The primary safety end-point was defined as the incidence of procedural and device related serious adverse events, whereas the efficacy endpoints were defined as the change in global LVEF by MUGA scan, change in NYHA classification of heart failure and in the distance achieved during a six-minute walk test (6MW) at 6-month follow-up. Forty subjects were randomised to the treatment arm (n=26), or to the control arm (n=14). There were 12 sustained arrhythmic events and one death after episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the treatment group and 14 events in the control group (P=ns). At 6-month follow-up, 6MW distance improved by 60.3±54.1?meters in the treated group as compared to no improvement in the control group (0.4±185.7?meters; P=ns). In the control group, 28.6% experienced worsening of heart failure status (4/14), while 14.3% experienced an improvement in NYHA classification (2/14). In the myoblast-treatment arm, one patient experienced a deterioration in NYHA classification (8.0%), whereas five patients improved one or two classes (20.0%; P=0.06). However, therapy did not improve global LVEF measured by MUGA at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that implantation of myoblasts in patients with HF is feasible, appears to be safe and may provide symptomatic relief, though no significant effect was detected on global LVEF.

摘要

目的

SEISMIC 研究是一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机研究,旨在评估在植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的心力衰竭患者中经皮肌母细胞植入的安全性和可行性。

方法和结果

患者按 2:1 随机分为自体成肌细胞治疗组和最佳药物治疗组。主要安全性终点定义为程序和器械相关严重不良事件的发生率,而疗效终点定义为 MUGA 扫描测量的整体左心室射血分数(LVEF)变化、心力衰竭纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级变化以及 6 分钟步行试验(6MWT)中 6 个月随访时的步行距离变化。40 名患者被随机分配到治疗组(n=26)或对照组(n=14)。在治疗组中,有 12 例持续性心律失常事件和 1 例因室性心动过速(VT)发作后死亡,对照组中则有 14 例事件(P=无统计学意义)。在 6 个月随访时,与对照组相比,治疗组 6MWT 距离增加了 60.3±54.1 米(治疗组:0.4±185.7 米;P=无统计学意义)。在对照组中,28.6%(4/14)的患者心力衰竭状态恶化,14.3%(2/14)的患者 NYHA 分级改善。在肌母细胞治疗组中,1 例患者 NYHA 分级恶化(8.0%),而 5 例患者改善一个或两个级别(20.0%;P=0.06)。然而,治疗并未改善 6 个月随访时 MUGA 测量的整体 LVEF。

结论

这些数据表明,在心力衰竭患者中植入肌母细胞是可行的,似乎是安全的,并可能提供症状缓解,尽管对整体 LVEF 没有检测到显著效果。

相似文献

1
Final results of a phase IIa, randomised, open-label trial to evaluate the percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in congestive heart failure patients: the SEISMIC trial.一项评价充血性心力衰竭患者自体骨骼肌成肌细胞经皮心肌内移植的 IIa 期、随机、开放标签试验的最终结果:SEISMIC 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):805-12. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A139.
2
Percutaneous trans-coronary-venous transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in the treatment of post-infarction myocardial contractility impairment: the POZNAN trial.自体骨骼肌成肌细胞经皮冠状动脉静脉移植治疗心肌梗死后心肌收缩功能障碍:波兹南试验
Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(12):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi159. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
3
Postinfarction heart failure: surgical and trans-coronary-venous transplantation of autologous myoblasts.心肌梗死后心力衰竭:自体成肌细胞的外科手术及经冠状静脉移植
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Mar;3 Suppl 1:S46-51. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0403.
4
Skeletal myoblasts for myocardial regeneration in patients with congestive heart failure: where have all the answers gone?用于充血性心力衰竭患者心肌再生的骨骼肌成肌细胞:答案都去哪儿了?
EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):789-93. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A135.
5
Percutaneous autologous myoblast transplantation in the treatment of post-infarction myocardial contractility impairment--report on two cases.经皮自体成肌细胞移植治疗心肌梗死后心肌收缩功能障碍——两例报告
Kardiol Pol. 2003 Dec;59(12):492-501.
6
Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for the treatment of postinfarction myocardial injury: phase I clinical study with 12 months of follow-up.自体骨骼肌成肌细胞移植治疗心肌梗死后心肌损伤:12个月随访的I期临床研究
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.043.
7
Amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure.胺碘酮用于充血性心力衰竭合并无症状室性心律失常患者。充血性心力衰竭抗心律失常治疗生存试验。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 13;333(2):77-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507133330201.
8
Skeletal myoblast transplantation: no MAGIC bullet for ischemic cardiomyopathy.骨骼肌成肌细胞移植:并非治疗缺血性心肌病的神奇疗法。
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):520-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1299. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
9
Safety and feasibility of autologous myoblast transplantation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: four-year follow-up.缺血性心肌病患者自体成肌细胞移植的安全性与可行性:四年随访
Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):1748-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.547810.
10
[Percutaneous transplantation of autologous myoblasts in ischemic cardiomyopathy].[自体成肌细胞经皮移植治疗缺血性心肌病]
Herz. 2005 May;30(3):223-31. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2623-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经心内膜干细胞治疗慢性缺血性心力衰竭的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2025;21(3):67-77. doi: 10.2174/011573403X353157250115105436.
2
Standardisation is the key to the sustained, rapid and healthy development of stem cell-based therapy.标准化是干细胞治疗持续、快速和健康发展的关键。
Clin Transl Med. 2024 Apr;14(4):e1646. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1646.
3
Contemporary Challenges of Regenerative Therapy in Patients with Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Failure.
缺血性和非缺血性心力衰竭患者再生治疗的当代挑战
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Dec 1;9(12):429. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9120429.
4
Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Endomyocardial Cell Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure by Combination of Individual Patient Data (IPD) of ACCRUE and Publication-Based Aggregate Data.通过ACCRUE的个体患者数据(IPD)与基于出版物的汇总数据相结合,对缺血性心力衰竭患者经皮心内膜细胞治疗进行Meta分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 4;11(11):3205. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113205.
5
Impact of procedural variability and study design quality on the efficacy of cell-based therapies for heart failure - a meta-analysis.程序性变异性和研究设计质量对心力衰竭细胞治疗疗效的影响 - 一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):e0261462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261462. eCollection 2022.
6
Effectiveness of Stem Cell Therapies in Improving Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.干细胞疗法改善心力衰竭患者临床结局的有效性。
Cureus. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):e17236. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17236. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Stem Cells in Cardiovascular Diseases: 30,000-Foot View.心血管疾病中的干细胞:宏观视角。
Cells. 2021 Mar 9;10(3):600. doi: 10.3390/cells10030600.
8
Can Stem Cells Improve Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure? A Literature Review of Skeletal Myoblasts and Bone Marrow-Derived Cells.干细胞能否改善心力衰竭患者的左心室射血分数?骨骼肌成肌细胞和骨髓源细胞的文献综述
Cureus. 2020 Nov 20;12(11):e11598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11598.
9
Growth factor therapy for cardiac repair: an overview of recent advances and future directions.用于心脏修复的生长因子疗法:近期进展与未来方向概述
Biophys Rev. 2020 Aug;12(4):805-815. doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00734-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
First-in-human PeriCord cardiac bioimplant: Scalability and GMP manufacturing of an allogeneic engineered tissue graft.首例人类心包心脏生物植入物:同种异体工程组织移植物的可扩展性和 GMP 制造。
EBioMedicine. 2020 Apr;54:102729. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102729. Epub 2020 Apr 15.