Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Eye (Lond). 2011 Mar;25(3):375-81. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.226. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
To determine the pre-treatment ocular factors significantly associated with the visual outcome 24 months after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV).
A total of 23 eyes of 23 patients with mCNV were treated with IVB followed by as needed therapy. The efficacy of IVB was evaluated by the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months after the initial treatment. Forward stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of pre-treatment factors on the BCVA and the improvement of the BCVA at 24 months.
The mean pre-IVB BCVA was 0.74 ± 0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units, and it improved to 0.43 ± 0.31 logMAR units after 1 month (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The improvement was maintained at 24 months (0.46 ± 0.40, P < 0.005). The mean number of IVB performed during the 24 months was 1.35 ± 0.71. Forward stepwise regression analysis showed that the pre-IVB CNV size (standardized β = 0.52, P < 0.01) and BCVA (standardized β = -0.44, P < 0.05) significantly affected the visual acuity change after 24 months. The CNV size was the only factor that significantly affected the BCVA after 24 months (standardized β=0.56, P < 0.01).
IVB with as needed therapy for mCNV led to a rapid and sustained visual improvement. Smaller CNV size was a significant prognostic factor that predicts better visual acuity. Patients with lower pre-treatment BCVA had better visual recovery than those with better pre-treatment BCVA, however, this may be due to a ceiling/floor effect.
确定与近视性脉络膜新生血管(mCNV)接受玻璃体内贝伐单抗(IVB)治疗 24 个月后的视力结果显著相关的预处理眼部因素。
对 23 例 mCNV 患者的 23 只眼进行 IVB 治疗,根据需要进行后续治疗。通过初始治疗后 24 个月的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)评估 IVB 的疗效。采用逐步正向多元线性回归分析评估预处理因素对 BCVA 和 24 个月时 BCVA 改善的影响。
平均 IVB 前 BCVA 为 0.74 ± 0.30 最小角分辨率对数(logMAR)单位,治疗后 1 个月提高至 0.43 ± 0.31 logMAR 单位(P < 0.001,配对 t 检验)。24 个月时仍保持改善(0.46 ± 0.40,P < 0.005)。24 个月期间平均进行 IVB 治疗 1.35 ± 0.71 次。逐步正向回归分析显示,IVB 前 CNV 大小(标准化β=0.52,P < 0.01)和 BCVA(标准化β=-0.44,P < 0.05)显著影响 24 个月后的视力变化。CNV 大小是 24 个月后唯一显著影响 BCVA 的因素(标准化β=0.56,P < 0.01)。
针对 mCNV 的 IVB 联合按需治疗可迅速且持续地改善视力。较小的 CNV 大小是预测更好视力的重要预后因素。治疗前 BCVA 较低的患者比治疗前 BCVA 较好的患者有更好的视力恢复,但这可能是由于天花板/地板效应。