• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前驱期综合征的结构化访谈韩国版的信度和效度。

The reliability and validity of the korean version of the structured interview for prodromal syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Dec;7(4):257-63. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.4.257. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

DOI:10.4306/pi.2010.7.4.257
PMID:21253409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022312/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndrome (SIPS) from Yale University is intended to diagnose prodromal syndrome of psychosis and to measure the severity of prodromal symptoms. Here, a Korean version of SIPS is presented, and its reliability, validity, and factor structures are examined using a representative Korean sample.

METHODS

The Korean version of SIPS was administered to 40 participants over a period of 1 year. The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the SIPS were then evaluated. In addition, its factor structure was investigated using principal-axis factor analysis. Concurrent validity was explored using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Of the 40 subjects, 12.5% developed psychotic disorders during the 1-year follow-up period. Inter-rater reliability was good (intra-class correlations=0.96), and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha=0.83). A three-factor resolution displayed the best simple structure and accounted for 52.6% of all item variance. Factors 1 and 2 showed strong correlations with negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction, respectively, on the PANSS. Factor 3 was not correlated with any factor on the PANSS.

CONCLUSION

The Korean version of SIPS is a reliable instrument for the assessment of prodromal symptoms in subjects and may be used to evaluate prodromal psychosis.

摘要

目的

耶鲁大学的前驱综合征结构性访谈(SIPS)旨在诊断精神病前驱综合征,并测量前驱症状的严重程度。在这里,我们呈现了 SIPS 的韩文版本,并使用具有代表性的韩国样本,对其信度、效度和因子结构进行了检验。

方法

在 1 年的时间里,对 40 名参与者进行了韩文版 SIPS 的测试。然后,评估了 SIPS 的组内信度和内部一致性。此外,使用主成分因子分析探讨了其因子结构。使用与阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)的 Pearson 相关系数来探讨其同时效度。

结果

在 40 名受试者中,有 12.5%在 1 年的随访期间发展为精神病障碍。组内信度良好(组内相关系数=0.96),内部一致性可接受(Cronbach's alpha=0.83)。三因子分辨率显示出最佳的简单结构,占所有项目方差的 52.6%。因子 1 和 2 与 PANSS 的阴性症状和认知功能障碍分别呈强相关,而因子 3 与 PANSS 上的任何因子均无相关性。

结论

韩文版 SIPS 是评估前驱症状的可靠工具,可用于评估前驱期精神病。

相似文献

1
The reliability and validity of the korean version of the structured interview for prodromal syndrome.前驱期综合征的结构化访谈韩国版的信度和效度。
Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Dec;7(4):257-63. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.4.257. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states.《有风险心理状态全面评估的韩国版的信度和效度》。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;15(6):1730-1737. doi: 10.1111/eip.13123. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
The Italian version of the 92-item Prodromal Questionnaire: Concurrent validity with the SIPS and factor analysis in a sample of 258 outpatients aged 11-36years.意大利版 92 项前驱期问卷:在一个年龄为 11-36 岁的 258 名门诊患者样本中与 SIPS 的并行效度和因子分析。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Psychometric Properties of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version among Chinese Help-Seeking Individuals.中国求助者中前驱症状问卷简版的心理测量学特性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148935. eCollection 2016.
5
Applicability of the Chinese version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (CPQ-16) for identifying attenuated psychosis syndrome in a college population.中文版16项前驱症状问卷(CPQ - 16)在大学生群体中识别亚临床精神病综合征的适用性。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;10(4):308-15. doi: 10.1111/eip.12173. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
6
Validation of the Korean Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version in Non-Help-Seeking Individuals.《前驱症状问卷简版韩文版在未寻求帮助个体中的效度验证》
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Feb;16(2):109-114. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.23. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Translation and validation study of the prodromal questionnaire brief version into Indonesian language.前驱期问卷简短版的印度尼西亚语翻译和验证研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Oct;37:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Turkish Version of Structured Interview of Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and Proposal of a Brief Version of SIPS as a Pretest Risk Enrichment.土耳其版精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS)及作为预测试风险富集的SIPS简短版本提案
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022 May 14;59(2):139-146. doi: 10.29399/npa.27793. eCollection 2022.
9
Validation of the Korean Version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in General Population.一般人群心理体验社区评估韩国版的验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Jul;20(7):625-634. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0011. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
10
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mismatch Negativity in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: No Evidence of Progressive Decline.临床高危精神病患者的失匹配负波:无渐进性衰退证据
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Sep;62(5):e70256. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70256.
2
Differential trajectories of corticostriatal structural connectivity in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis according to functional outcome.根据功能结局,精神病临床高危个体中皮质纹状体结构连接的差异轨迹。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):319. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03567-1.
3
Development of an eye-tracking system based on a deep learning model to assess executive function in patients with mental illnesses.基于深度学习模型的眼动追踪系统开发,用于评估精神疾病患者的执行功能。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 6;14(1):18186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68586-2.
4
Fronto-temporal cortical grey matter thickness and surface area in the at-risk mental state and recent-onset schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study.处于高危精神状态和近期发病精神分裂症个体的额颞皮质灰质厚度和表面积:一项磁共振成像研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05494-9.
5
Beyond verbal fluency in the verbal fluency task: semantic clustering as a predictor of remission in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.在言语流畅性任务中超越言语流畅性:语义聚类作为精神病高危个体缓解的预测指标。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Nov 1;48(6):E414-E420. doi: 10.1503/jpn.230074. Print 2023 Nov-Dec.
6
Magnetic resonance texture analysis reveals stagewise nonlinear alterations of the frontal gray matter in patients with early psychosis.磁共振纹理分析揭示早期精神病患者额部灰质的阶段性非线性改变。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;28(12):5309-5318. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02163-3. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
Triple-Network Dysconnectivity in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis and Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.首发精神病患者及临床高危个体的三重网络失连接
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Dec;19(12):1037-1045. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0091. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
8
Large-Scale Thalamocortical Triple Network Dysconnectivities in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis and Individuals at Risk for Psychosis.首发精神病患者和精神病高危个体的大规模丘脑皮质三网络连接断开。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 15;49(2):375-384. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac174.
9
Turkish Version of Structured Interview of Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and Proposal of a Brief Version of SIPS as a Pretest Risk Enrichment.土耳其版精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS)及作为预测试风险富集的SIPS简短版本提案
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022 May 14;59(2):139-146. doi: 10.29399/npa.27793. eCollection 2022.
10
Thalamocortical dysrhythmia in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和精神病临床高危个体的丘脑皮质节律紊乱。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Feb;47(3):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01180-6. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
Symptomatic and functional outcome in youth at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a longitudinal study.青年精神病超高危人群的症状和功能结局:一项纵向研究。
Schizophr Res. 2009 Dec;115(2-3):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
3
Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study.首发精神病前驱期风险综合征的效度:来自北美前驱期纵向研究的结果
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Sep;35(5):894-908. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp027. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
4
Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America.北美高临床风险青年期精神病的预测:一项多中心纵向研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;65(1):28-37. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.3.
5
Declining transition rate in ultra high risk (prodromal) services: dilution or reduction of risk?超高风险(前驱期)服务中过渡率下降:风险稀释还是降低?
Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):673-81. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm015. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
6
Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population.普通人群中精神病性障碍和双相I型障碍的终生患病率。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;64(1):19-28. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.19.
7
[Predictive validity of the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS)].[前驱症状量表(SOPS)的预测效度]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006 Jul-Aug;34(4):216-23.
8
Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States.绘制精神病发作轨迹:高危精神状态综合评估
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):964-71. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01714.x.
9
Factorial structure of the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms.前驱症状量表的因子结构。
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):339-47. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00053-7.
10
Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.使用前驱综合征结构化访谈和前驱症状量表进行前驱评估:预测效度、评分者间信度以及信度训练。
Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(4):703-15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007040.