Suppr超能文献

恒压与恒流速梯度洗脱分离的动力学性能限制。第二部分:实验。

Kinetic performance limits of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separations. Part II: experimental.

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Chemical Engineering (CHIS-IR), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2011 Feb 25;1218(8):1170-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.087. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

Abstract

We report on a first series of experiments comparing the selectivity and the kinetic performance of constant flow rate and constant pressure mode gradient elution separations. Both water-methanol and water-acetonitrile mobile phase mixtures have been considered, as well as different samples and gradient programs. Instrument pressures up to 1200 bar have been used. Neglecting some small possible deviations caused by viscous heating effects, the experiments could confirm the theoretical expectation that both operation modes should lead to identical separation selectivities provided the same mobile phase gradient program is run in reduced volumetric coordinates. Also in agreement with the theoretical expectations, the cP-mode led to a gain in analysis time amounting up to some 17% for linear gradients running from 5 to 95% of organic modifier at ultra-high pressures. Gains of over 25% were obtained for segmented gradients, at least when the flat portions of the gradient program were situated in regions where the gradient composition was the least viscous. Detailed plate height measurements showed that the single difference between the constant flow rate and the constant pressure mode is a (small) difference in efficiency caused by the difference in average flow rate, in turn leading to a different intrinsic band broadening. Separating a phenone sample with a 20-95% water-acetonitrile gradient, the cP-mode leads to gradient plate heights that are some 20-40% smaller than in the cF-mode in the B-term dominated regime, while they are some 5-10% larger in the C-term dominated regime. Considering a separation with sub 2-μm particles on a 350 mm long coupled column, switching to the constant pressure mode allowed to finish the run in 29 instead of in 35 min, while also a larger peak capacity is obtained (going from 334 in the cF-mode to 339 in the cP-mode) and the mutual selectivity between the different peaks is fully retained.

摘要

我们报告了一系列比较等度洗脱和梯度洗脱的选择性和动力学性能的实验。实验中考虑了水-甲醇和水-乙腈两种流动相体系,以及不同的样品和梯度程序。仪器压力高达 1200 bar。除了由粘性加热效应引起的一些小偏差,实验可以证实这样的理论预期,即在相同的体积坐标下运行相同的流动相梯度程序时,两种操作模式都应导致相同的分离选择性。也与理论预期一致,在超高压下,对于线性梯度从 5%到 95%有机改性剂的程序,cP 模式的分析时间可缩短约 17%。对于分段梯度,至少当梯度程序的平坦部分处于梯度组成最不粘的区域时,可获得超过 25%的增益。详细的板高测量表明,恒流模式和恒压模式之间的唯一区别是由于平均流速的差异而导致的(小)效率差异,从而导致不同的固有带宽展宽。用 20-95%水-乙腈梯度分离苯乙酮样品时,在 B 项占主导的区域,cP 模式的梯度板高比 cF 模式小 20-40%,而在 C 项占主导的区域,cP 模式的梯度板高比 cF 模式大 5-10%。考虑在 350mm 长的耦合柱上用 2μm 以下的颗粒进行分离,切换到恒压模式可将运行时间从 35 分钟缩短至 29 分钟,同时还可获得更大的峰容量(从 cF 模式的 334 个峰增加到 cP 模式的 339 个峰),并且不同峰之间的相互选择性得到完全保留。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验