Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;57(6):564-571.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.027. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia seen in the emergency department (ED), yet there is little research describing its management and outcomes. We analyze the success and safety of treatment of ED patients with atrial flutter.
This was a retrospective cohort study obtained by searching the ED administrative database of 2 urban hospitals to identify consecutive patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of atrial flutter from April 1, 2006, to January 31, 2009. We linked each patient's unique provincial health number to the provincial vital statistics registry and the regional ED database to identify subsequent deaths and strokes within 1 year. Manual chart review was conducted to confirm rhythms and outcomes and to identify patient comorbidities. Patients were stratified into 5 groups based on initial ED presentation and management approach: electrocardioversion, chemical cardioversion, spontaneous cardioversion, rate control only, and no acute ED arrhythmia-specific treatment. Primary outcome was the combined 1-year rate of stroke or death, and secondary outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients with conversion to normal sinus rhythm in each group and discharged to home.
Data from 122 consecutive patients with a primary ED diagnosis of atrial flutter were collected; there were 3 deaths and no strokes (2.5%; 95% confidence interval 0% to 5.1%) in the following year. Patients undergoing electrocardioversion achieved normal sinus rhythm 91% of the time, with 93% discharged home; patients undergoing oral or intravenous antiarrhythmic treatment achieved sinus rhythm 27% of the time, with 60% discharged home. Discharge rates of patients with spontaneous cardioversion, rate control, and no ED treatment were 93%, 58%, and 96%, respectively.
In this 2-center cohort of ED patients with atrial flutter, patients eligible for rhythm control had a higher success and lower admission rate with electrocardioversion than patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications. Overall, the majority of patients were discharged home. Deaths were typically related to concurrent medical illness rather than atrial flutter.
心房颤动是急诊科常见的心律失常,但关于其治疗和结局的研究甚少。我们分析了急诊科心房颤动患者的治疗成功率和安全性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,通过检索 2 家城市医院的急诊科行政数据库,确定了 2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2009 年 1 月 31 日期间以原发性心房颤动出院诊断的连续患者。我们将每位患者的唯一省级健康号码与省级生命统计登记处和区域急诊科数据库相关联,以确定 1 年内的后续死亡和中风。进行了手动图表审查,以确认节律和结局,并确定患者的合并症。根据初始急诊科表现和管理方法,患者分为 5 组:电复律、化学复律、自发复律、仅控制心率和无急性急诊科心律失常特异性治疗。主要结局是 1 年内中风或死亡的联合发生率,次要结局包括每组转复为正常窦性节律的合格患者比例和出院回家的比例。
共收集了 122 例原发性急诊科诊断为心房颤动的连续患者的数据;在接下来的 1 年中,有 3 例死亡,无中风(2.5%;95%置信区间 0%至 5.1%)。接受电复律的患者 91%的时间恢复为正常窦性节律,93%出院回家;接受口服或静脉抗心律失常药物治疗的患者 27%的时间恢复为窦性节律,60%出院回家。自发复律、心率控制和无急诊科治疗的患者出院率分别为 93%、58%和 96%。
在这项由 2 个中心组成的急诊科心房颤动患者队列中,有节律控制适应证的患者接受电复律的成功率和住院率高于接受抗心律失常药物治疗的患者。总体而言,大多数患者出院回家。死亡通常与合并症有关,而不是与心房颤动有关。