Vandermolen Justin L, Sadaf Murrium I, Gehi Anil K
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Jun 30;11(1):1810. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1810. eCollection 2018 Jun-Jul.
Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in the emergency department (ED) varies greatly, and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED, and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED.
A systematic review was done using PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE, combining the search terms "Atrial Fibrillation", "Atrial Flutter", "Emergency Medicine", "Emergency Service", and "Emergency Treatment". After removal of duplicates, 754 articles were identified. After initial screening of titles and abstracts, 69full text articles were carefully reviewed and 34 articles were ultimately included in the study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were grouped into four main categories: decision aids and outcome predictors, electrical cardioversion-based protocols, antiarrhythmic-based protocols, and general management protocols.
This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition. There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population, and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge.
急诊科(ED)对心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)的管理差异很大,目前尚无美国指南来指导ED治疗后患者处置方面的管理。本系统评价的目的是评估文献中用于指导ED中AF/AFL患者处置的决策辅助工具,并评估与ED中不同管理策略相关的潜在结局。
使用PubMed(MEDLINE)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和EMBASE进行系统评价,组合检索词“心房颤动”、“心房扑动”、“急诊医学”、“急诊服务”和“急诊治疗”。去除重复项后,共识别出754篇文章。在对标题和摘要进行初步筛选后,对69篇全文文章进行了仔细审查,最终根据纳入和排除标准将34篇文章纳入研究。这些文章分为四大类:决策辅助工具和结局预测指标、基于电复律的方案、基于抗心律失常药物的方案以及一般管理方案。
据我们所知,本系统评价是第一项评估ED中症状性AF/AFL的最佳管理对ED处置有直接影响的研究。有几种可行的管理策略可使合适的患者群体安全地从ED出院,并且可以利用决策辅助工具来指导选择合适的出院患者。