Shimizu K, Kamiya O, Hamajima N, Mizuno H, Kobayashi M, Hirabayashi N, Takeyama H, Kato R, Kawashima K, Nitta M
Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake.
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990 Dec;81(12):1320-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x.
A cooperative randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of multi-drug combination chemotherapy (VMCP), vincristine-melphalan-cyclophosphamide-prednisolone) with CP (cyclophosphamide-prednisolone) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was performed. When the whole group of patients was evaluated, the choice of chemotherapy (VMCP or CP) was not a significant prognostic factor associated with response or survival by uni- or multivariate analysis, and the difference between the survival curves of the treatment groups was only marginally significant. However, when the analysis was confined to stage III patients, the choice of chemotherapy became a significant prognostic factor associated with both response rate and survival, and the statistical difference between survival curves was significant. Taking the disease characteristics of multiple myeloma into consideration, the better result obtained with multi-drug combination chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III patients is consistent with other studies supporting the superiority of multi-drug combination chemotherapy for patients with overt systemic disease.
开展了一项合作随机临床试验,比较多药联合化疗(VMCP,长春新碱-美法仑-环磷酰胺-泼尼松龙)与CP(环磷酰胺-泼尼松龙)治疗多发性骨髓瘤的有效性。对全体患者进行评估时,通过单因素或多因素分析,化疗方案的选择(VMCP或CP)并非与缓解或生存相关的显著预后因素,且治疗组生存曲线之间的差异仅具有微弱显著性。然而,当分析局限于III期患者时,化疗方案的选择成为与缓解率和生存均相关的显著预后因素,且生存曲线之间的统计学差异显著。考虑到多发性骨髓瘤的疾病特征,多药联合化疗在治疗III期患者时取得的更好结果与其他支持多药联合化疗对明显全身性疾病患者更具优势的研究结果一致。