• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of two combination chemotherapy regimens for multiple myeloma: methyl-CCNU, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone.

作者信息

Cavagnaro F, Lein J M, Pavlovsky S, Becherini J O, Pileggi J E, Micheo E Q, Jait C, Musso A, Suárez A, Pizzolato M

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rep. 1980 Jan;64(1):73-9.

PMID:6991106
Abstract

Of 139 evaluable and previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, 67 received methyl-CCNU-cyclophosphamide-prednisone (group A) and 72 received melphalan-prednisone (group B); 48% and 33% respectively had good responses and the overall response rates (good plus partial) were 75% and 65% for groups A and B respectively. The survival curves for both groups of patients were similar, with a median survival of 32 months. At 36 months, 70% of those patients who obtained good response were alive, 29% of those with partial response were alive, and 13% of those with no response were alive. The clinical staging system described by Durie and Salmon shows a good prognosis for stage I patients, with 80% remaining alive at 48 months, while the survival curves for stage II and III patients were similar, with 33% and 28% respectively remaining alive at 48 months. The combination of methyl-CCNU-cyclophosphamide-prednisone is not more effective in terms of response rate or duration of survival than melphalan-prednisone.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of two combination chemotherapy regimens for multiple myeloma: methyl-CCNU, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1980 Jan;64(1):73-9.
2
Phase III study of intermittent carmustine (BCNU), cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus intermittent melphalan and prednisone in myeloma.卡莫司汀(BCNU)、环磷酰胺和泼尼松间歇性给药与美法仑和泼尼松间歇性给药治疗骨髓瘤的Ⅲ期研究
Cancer Treat Rep. 1982 Jun;66(6):1273-7.
3
Comparison of melphalan and prednisone with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2479.美法仑和泼尼松联合长春新碱、卡莫司汀、美法仑、环磷酰胺及泼尼松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的比较:东部肿瘤协作组E2479研究结果
Cancer. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1561-7.
4
Combination chemotherapy for multiple myeloma with melphalan, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and carmustine (BCNU) (M-2 protocol).
Cancer Treat Rep. 1982 Nov;66(11):1971-3.
5
The addition of interferon or high dose cyclophosphamide to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma: phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Clinical Trial EST 9486.在多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗中,于标准化疗基础上加用干扰素或大剂量环磷酰胺:东部肿瘤协作组III期临床试验EST 9486
Cancer. 1999 Sep 15;86(6):957-68.
6
[Treatment of multiple myeloma using vincristine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan and prednisone (VCMP). Long-term results in 63 patients].[使用长春新碱、环磷酰胺、美法仑和泼尼松(VCMP)治疗多发性骨髓瘤。63例患者的长期结果]
Sangre (Barc). 1990 Apr;35(2):93-7.
7
[Combination chemotherapy with vincristine, melphalan, CCNA, cyclophosphamide, prednisone in myeloma].
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1984 May;51(5):263-7.
8
Therapy for multiple myeloma with alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy combinations: heterogeneity of tumor responsiveness.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1984 Dec;68(12):1439-46.
9
Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: updated time-to-events results and prognostic factors for time to progression.硼替佐米联合美法仑及泼尼松用于老年初治多发性骨髓瘤患者:更新的事件发生时间结果及疾病进展时间的预后因素
Haematologica. 2008 Apr;93(4):560-5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12106. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
10
Effectiveness of two-stage treatment of multiple myeloma with melphalan and with melphalan in combination with cyclophosphamide, carmustine, vincristine and prednisone.
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1981;29(2):145-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. New developments.老年多发性骨髓瘤的治疗。新进展。
Drugs Aging. 1997 Aug;11(2):152-64. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199711020-00007.
2
Treatment of multiple myeloma according to the extension of the disease: a prospective, randomised study comparing a less with a more aggressive cystostatic policy. Cooperative Group of Study and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.根据疾病分期治疗多发性骨髓瘤:一项前瞻性随机研究,比较较温和与更积极的细胞周期抑制策略。多发性骨髓瘤研究与治疗协作组
Br J Cancer. 1994 Dec;70(6):1203-10. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.474.
3
Controversies in the treatment of plasma cell myeloma.
浆细胞骨髓瘤治疗中的争议
Postgrad Med J. 1985 Feb;61(712):109-16. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.61.712.109.
4
Prognostic factors and classification in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的预后因素与分类
Br J Cancer. 1989 Jan;59(1):113-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.23.
5
Multi-drug combination therapy with vincristine-melphalan-cyclophosphamide-prednisolone was more effective than cyclophosphamide-prednisolone in stage III myeloma. The Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group.在III期骨髓瘤中,长春新碱-美法仑-环磷酰胺-泼尼松联合多药治疗比环磷酰胺-泼尼松治疗更有效。名古屋骨髓瘤协作研究组。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990 Dec;81(12):1320-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x.