Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, MS K9-36, Richland, WA, USA.
Microb Biotechnol. 2009 Mar;2(2):274-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00087.x.
The increasing availability of the genome sequences of microorganisms involved in important bioremediation processes makes it feasible to consider developing genome-scale models that can aid in predicting the likely outcome of potential subsurface bioremediation strategies. Previous studies of the in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater have demonstrated that Geobacter species are often the dominant members of the groundwater community during active bioremediation and the primary organisms catalysing U(VI) reduction. Therefore, a genome-scale, constraint-based model of the metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens was coupled with the reactive transport model HYDROGEOCHEM in an attempt to model in situ uranium bioremediation. In order to simplify the modelling, the influence of only three growth factors was considered: acetate, the electron donor added to stimulate U(VI) reduction; Fe(III), the electron acceptor primarily supporting growth of Geobacter; and ammonium, a key nutrient. The constraint-based model predicted that growth yields of Geobacter varied significantly based on the availability of these three growth factors and that there are minimum thresholds of acetate and Fe(III) below which growth and activity are not possible. This contrasts with typical, empirical microbial models that assume fixed growth yields and the possibility for complete metabolism of the substrates. The coupled genome-scale and reactive transport model predicted acetate concentrations and U(VI) reduction rates in a field trial of in situ uranium bioremediation that were comparable to the predictions of a calibrated conventional model, but without the need for empirical calibration, other than specifying the initial biomass of Geobacter. These results suggest that coupling genome-scale metabolic models with reactive transport models may be a good approach to developing models that can be truly predictive, without empirical calibration, for evaluating the probable response of subsurface microorganisms to possible bioremediation approaches prior to implementation.
参与重要生物修复过程的微生物的基因组序列的日益普及使得开发能够帮助预测潜在地下生物修复策略可能结果的基因组规模模型成为可能。先前对受铀污染地下水的原位生物修复的研究表明,在积极的生物修复过程中,地杆菌属(Geobacter)物种通常是地下水群落中的优势成员,也是催化 U(VI)还原的主要生物。因此,尝试对原位铀生物修复进行建模,将地杆菌属(Geobacter sulfurreducens)的基因组规模、基于约束的代谢模型与反应性传输模型 HYDROGEOCHEM 耦合。为了简化建模,只考虑了三种生长因子的影响:乙酸盐,添加的电子供体来刺激 U(VI)还原;Fe(III),主要支持地杆菌生长的电子受体;和铵盐,一种关键营养素。基于约束的模型预测,地杆菌的生长产量根据这三种生长因子的可用性而有很大差异,并且在低于乙酸盐和 Fe(III)的最低阈值时,生长和活性是不可能的。这与典型的经验微生物模型形成对比,后者假设固定的生长产量和完全代谢底物的可能性。耦合的基因组规模和反应性传输模型预测了原位铀生物修复现场试验中的乙酸盐浓度和 U(VI)还原速率,与经过校准的传统模型的预测相当,但无需经验校准,除了指定地杆菌的初始生物量。这些结果表明,将基因组规模代谢模型与反应性传输模型耦合可能是一种很好的方法,可以开发出真正具有预测性的模型,而无需经验校准,以评估地下微生物对可能的生物修复方法的响应,然后再实施。