Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):50-6. doi: 10.1177/0885066610384070.
To assess the results of a quality improvement (QI) project designed to improve safety of emergency endotracheal intubation (EEI).
Single center prospective observational.
16-bed intensive care unit.
Nine pulmonary/critical care fellows.
For 3 years, EEI performed by the medical intensive care unit team were analyzed to identify interventions that would improve quality of the procedure. By segmental process analysis, the procedure of EEI was subjected to iterative change. Major components of process improvement were development of a combined team approach, a mandatory checklist, use of crew resource management (CRM) tactics, and postevent debriefing. Quality analysis and improvement included training of fellows using scenario-based training (SBT) with computerized patient simulator (CPS) to improve mechanical skills of intubation and team leadership. Fellows received 15 sessions of SBT with CPS using a combined checklist and team approach before assuming team leadership position during real-life EEI.
For a 10-month period, fellows carried digital voice recorders to EEI; which, when combined with recording of continuous oximetry and BP monitoring were used to assess the quality of EEI.
128 EEI were performed of which 101 had full data recorded. Complications were 14% severe hypoxemia (<80% saturation), 6% severe hypotension (SBP<70 mm Hg), 1% death, 20% difficult EEI (≥ 3 attempts), 11% esophageal intubations, 2% aspiration, and 1% dental injury; 62% EEI were successfully achieved on first attempt, 11% required >3 attempts.
EEI may be performed by pulmonary/critical medicine (PCCM) fellows with safety comparable to that described in other studies on EEI. Important parts of the program included the use of formal iterative QI approach, the use of intensive SBT with CPS, basic CRM, a comprehensive checklist, and a combined team approach. A key benefit of the program was to make the process of EEI fully transparent for ongoing quality and safety improvement.
评估一项旨在提高紧急气管插管(EEI)安全性的质量改进(QI)项目的结果。
单中心前瞻性观察。
16 张床的重症监护病房。
9 名肺/重症监护医师。
在 3 年的时间里,对由重症监护病房团队进行的 EEI 进行了分析,以确定可以提高手术质量的干预措施。通过分段过程分析,EEI 手术经历了迭代变更。过程改进的主要组成部分是制定联合团队方法、强制性检查表、使用机组资源管理(CRM)策略和事后汇报。质量分析和改进包括使用计算机化患者模拟器(CPS)进行基于情景的培训(SBT)来培训医师,以提高插管的机械技能和团队领导能力。在承担真实生活中的 EEI 团队领导角色之前,医师接受了 15 次使用组合检查表和团队方法的 SBT 培训。
在 10 个月的时间里,医师携带数字语音记录器进行 EEI;结合连续血氧监测和血压监测的记录,用于评估 EEI 的质量。
进行了 128 次 EEI,其中 101 次有完整的数据记录。并发症为 14%严重低氧血症(<80%饱和度)、6%严重低血压(SBP<70mmHg)、1%死亡、20%困难的 EEI(≥3 次尝试)、11%食管插管、2%误吸和 1%牙齿损伤;62%的 EEI 首次尝试成功,11%需要>3 次尝试。
肺/重症医学(PCCM)医师进行 EEI 的安全性可与其他 EEI 研究中描述的安全性相媲美。该计划的重要组成部分包括使用正式的迭代 QI 方法、使用 CPS 进行强化 SBT、基本的 CRM、综合检查表和联合团队方法。该计划的一个关键优势是使 EEI 过程完全透明,以实现持续的质量和安全改进。