• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤每周甲氨蝶呤或多柔比星脉冲化疗的 III 期临床试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
2
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;7(7):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub3.
3
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 9;2016(6):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub4.
4
Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?对于低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤,不同的甲氨蝶呤方案作为一线治疗,是否比妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)0174中使用的放线菌素方案更具成本效益?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
5
First line chemotherapy in low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub2.
6
Phase II trial of pulse dactinomycin as salvage therapy for failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.放线菌素脉冲式治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤挽救疗法的II期试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究
Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22118.
7
The efficacy and safety of first-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A network meta-analysis.一线单药化疗方案治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的疗效和安全性:网状 Meta 分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Feb;148(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
8
An international randomized phase III trial of pulse actinomycin-D versus multi-day methotrexate for the treatment of low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; NRG/GOG 275.一项关于阿霉素脉冲治疗与多日甲氨蝶呤治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的国际随机 III 期试验;NRG/GOG 275。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 May 24.
9
EP-EMA regimen (etoposide and cisplatin with etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin) in a series of 18 women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.EP-EMA 方案(依托泊苷和顺铂联合依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤和多柔比星)治疗 18 例妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jun;22(5):875-80. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824d834d.
10
Outcome of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的结局:来自印度一家三级癌症中心的经验。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Jan;26(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Outcomes and Resistance Patterns in Low Risk GTN: A 270-Patient Experience from a Tertiary Center.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗结局与耐药模式:来自三级中心的270例患者经验
Reprod Sci. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01960-1.
2
Fertility Sparing Medical Management Options in Gynecologic Cancers.妇科癌症中保留生育功能的医学管理方案
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Mar;26(3):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01299-4. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
Factors influencing serum hCG negativization timing in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.影响妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素转阴时间的因素。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):331-347. doi: 10.62347/HFRL7722. eCollection 2025.
4
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasm: Patient outcomes and clinical pearls from a multidisciplinary referral center.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:来自多学科转诊中心的患者结局及临床要点
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;192:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
5
Risk factors for methotrexate resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients (FIGO score 0-4).低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者(FIGO评分0 - 4)中对甲氨蝶呤耐药的危险因素。
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):1353-1362. doi: 10.62347/ZUCG8140. eCollection 2024.
6
Successful Management of Persistent Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Comprehensive Review and Case Analysis.持续性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的成功管理:全面综述与病例分析
Cureus. 2023 Dec 26;15(12):e51112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51112. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
First-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a network meta-analysis.低风险妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线单药化疗:一项网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 5;13:1276771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276771. eCollection 2023.
8
Genome mining of actinomycin shunt products from sp. YINM00002.来自YINM00002菌株的放线菌素分流产物的基因组挖掘
RSC Adv. 2023 Dec 12;13(51):36200-36208. doi: 10.1039/d3ra07277k. eCollection 2023 Dec 8.
9
Review of current literature on gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的文献综述。
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023 Nov 27;35(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43046-023-00195-y.
10
Challenges in treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in patients with MTHFR mutation: A case report.甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(MTHFR)突变患者妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗挑战:一例报告
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jun 29;48:101234. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101234. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Negotiating a staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. A progress report.商讨妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的分期及风险因素评分系统。进展报告。
J Reprod Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):445-50.
2
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and evidence-based medicine.妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤与循证医学
J Reprod Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):427-32.
3
Is lack of response to single-agent chemotherapy in gestational trophoblastic disease associated with dose scheduling or chemotherapy resistance?妊娠滋养细胞疾病中对单药化疗无反应是与剂量安排还是化疗耐药有关?
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Apr;85(1):36-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6533.
4
Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000.低风险持续性妊娠滋养细胞疾病:1992年至2000年低剂量甲氨蝶呤和亚叶酸初始治疗后的结局
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1838-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.166.
5
Methotrexate infusion in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.低风险妊娠滋养细胞疾病的甲氨蝶呤输注
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;183(6):1579-82. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108077.
6
Better treatments that cost more: the dilemma.更好但成本更高的治疗方法:困境。
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Jul;78(1):1-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5885.
7
Combination but not single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumors increases the incidence of second tumors.对于妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤,联合使用甲氨蝶呤化疗而非单药甲氨蝶呤化疗会增加第二肿瘤的发生率。
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2769-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2769.
8
Treatment of low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors with single-agent chemotherapy.采用单药化疗治疗低危转移性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;174(6):1917-23; discussion 1923-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70229-6.
9
5-day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease.对患有转移性妊娠滋养细胞疾病的女性使用甲氨蝶呤进行为期5天的治疗。
Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Jul;54(1):76-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1169.
10
Single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors.单药甲氨蝶呤化疗治疗非转移性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):574-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90575-8.

低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤每周甲氨蝶呤或多柔比星脉冲化疗的 III 期临床试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。

Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study.

机构信息

Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386
PMID:21263100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3068058/
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the best regimen for the primary treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two commonly used single-drug regimens were compared with respect to the proportion of patients meeting the criteria for a complete response (CR) in a randomized phase III trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Eligibility was purposefully broad to maximize the generalizability of the results and included patients with a WHO risk score of 0 to 6 and patients with metastatic disease (limited to lung lesions < 2 cm, adnexa, or vagina) or choriocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty women were enrolled, and 216 were deemed eligible. Biweekly intravenous dactinomycin 1.25 mg/m² was statistically superior to weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate 30 mg/m² (CR: 70% v 53%; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with low-risk GTN as defined before the 2002 WHO risk score revisions (risk score of 0 to 4 and excluding choriocarcinoma), response was 58% and 73% in the methotrexate and dactinomycin arms, respectively (P = .03). Both regimens were less effective if the WHO risk score was 5 or 6 or if the diagnosis was choriocarcinoma (CR: 9% and 42%, respectively). There were two potential recurrences; one at 4 months (dactinomycin) and one at 22 months (methotrexate). Not all patients completed follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The biweekly dactinomycin regimen has a higher CR rate than the weekly IM methotrexate regimen in low-risk GTN, a generally curable disease.

摘要

目的

对于低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)的一线治疗,目前尚无最佳方案。

患者和方法

在妇科肿瘤学组开展的一项随机 III 期试验中,我们比较了两种常用的单药方案,以评估达到完全缓解(CR)标准的患者比例。本试验的纳入标准非常广泛,旨在使研究结果更具普遍性,包括世界卫生组织(WHO)风险评分为 0-6 分的患者和转移患者(仅限于肺转移灶<2cm、附件或阴道转移)或绒毛膜癌患者。

结果

共纳入 240 例患者,其中 216 例患者符合入组条件。每 2 周静脉滴注放线菌素 D 1.25mg/m²与每周肌内注射(IM)甲氨蝶呤 30mg/m²相比,具有统计学优势(CR:70%比 53%;P=0.01)。同样,在根据 2002 年 WHO 风险评分修订版定义的低危型 GTN 患者(风险评分为 0-4 分,且不包括绒毛膜癌)中,甲氨蝶呤组和放线菌素 D 组的缓解率分别为 58%和 73%(P=0.03)。如果 WHO 风险评分为 5 分或 6 分或诊断为绒毛膜癌,两种方案的疗效均较差(CR:9%和 42%)。有 2 例潜在复发,分别发生在第 4 个月(放线菌素 D 组)和第 22 个月(甲氨蝶呤组)。并非所有患者均完成随访。两种方案均具有良好的耐受性。

结论

对于一般可治愈的低危型 GTN,与每周 IM 甲氨蝶呤方案相比,每 2 周的放线菌素 D 方案具有更高的 CR 率。