Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
There is no consensus on the best regimen for the primary treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).
Two commonly used single-drug regimens were compared with respect to the proportion of patients meeting the criteria for a complete response (CR) in a randomized phase III trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Eligibility was purposefully broad to maximize the generalizability of the results and included patients with a WHO risk score of 0 to 6 and patients with metastatic disease (limited to lung lesions < 2 cm, adnexa, or vagina) or choriocarcinoma.
Two hundred forty women were enrolled, and 216 were deemed eligible. Biweekly intravenous dactinomycin 1.25 mg/m² was statistically superior to weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate 30 mg/m² (CR: 70% v 53%; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with low-risk GTN as defined before the 2002 WHO risk score revisions (risk score of 0 to 4 and excluding choriocarcinoma), response was 58% and 73% in the methotrexate and dactinomycin arms, respectively (P = .03). Both regimens were less effective if the WHO risk score was 5 or 6 or if the diagnosis was choriocarcinoma (CR: 9% and 42%, respectively). There were two potential recurrences; one at 4 months (dactinomycin) and one at 22 months (methotrexate). Not all patients completed follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated.
The biweekly dactinomycin regimen has a higher CR rate than the weekly IM methotrexate regimen in low-risk GTN, a generally curable disease.
对于低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)的一线治疗,目前尚无最佳方案。
在妇科肿瘤学组开展的一项随机 III 期试验中,我们比较了两种常用的单药方案,以评估达到完全缓解(CR)标准的患者比例。本试验的纳入标准非常广泛,旨在使研究结果更具普遍性,包括世界卫生组织(WHO)风险评分为 0-6 分的患者和转移患者(仅限于肺转移灶<2cm、附件或阴道转移)或绒毛膜癌患者。
共纳入 240 例患者,其中 216 例患者符合入组条件。每 2 周静脉滴注放线菌素 D 1.25mg/m²与每周肌内注射(IM)甲氨蝶呤 30mg/m²相比,具有统计学优势(CR:70%比 53%;P=0.01)。同样,在根据 2002 年 WHO 风险评分修订版定义的低危型 GTN 患者(风险评分为 0-4 分,且不包括绒毛膜癌)中,甲氨蝶呤组和放线菌素 D 组的缓解率分别为 58%和 73%(P=0.03)。如果 WHO 风险评分为 5 分或 6 分或诊断为绒毛膜癌,两种方案的疗效均较差(CR:9%和 42%)。有 2 例潜在复发,分别发生在第 4 个月(放线菌素 D 组)和第 22 个月(甲氨蝶呤组)。并非所有患者均完成随访。两种方案均具有良好的耐受性。
对于一般可治愈的低危型 GTN,与每周 IM 甲氨蝶呤方案相比,每 2 周的放线菌素 D 方案具有更高的 CR 率。