Suppr超能文献

低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤每周甲氨蝶呤或多柔比星脉冲化疗的 III 期临床试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。

Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study.

机构信息

Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the best regimen for the primary treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two commonly used single-drug regimens were compared with respect to the proportion of patients meeting the criteria for a complete response (CR) in a randomized phase III trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Eligibility was purposefully broad to maximize the generalizability of the results and included patients with a WHO risk score of 0 to 6 and patients with metastatic disease (limited to lung lesions < 2 cm, adnexa, or vagina) or choriocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty women were enrolled, and 216 were deemed eligible. Biweekly intravenous dactinomycin 1.25 mg/m² was statistically superior to weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate 30 mg/m² (CR: 70% v 53%; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with low-risk GTN as defined before the 2002 WHO risk score revisions (risk score of 0 to 4 and excluding choriocarcinoma), response was 58% and 73% in the methotrexate and dactinomycin arms, respectively (P = .03). Both regimens were less effective if the WHO risk score was 5 or 6 or if the diagnosis was choriocarcinoma (CR: 9% and 42%, respectively). There were two potential recurrences; one at 4 months (dactinomycin) and one at 22 months (methotrexate). Not all patients completed follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The biweekly dactinomycin regimen has a higher CR rate than the weekly IM methotrexate regimen in low-risk GTN, a generally curable disease.

摘要

目的

对于低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)的一线治疗,目前尚无最佳方案。

患者和方法

在妇科肿瘤学组开展的一项随机 III 期试验中,我们比较了两种常用的单药方案,以评估达到完全缓解(CR)标准的患者比例。本试验的纳入标准非常广泛,旨在使研究结果更具普遍性,包括世界卫生组织(WHO)风险评分为 0-6 分的患者和转移患者(仅限于肺转移灶<2cm、附件或阴道转移)或绒毛膜癌患者。

结果

共纳入 240 例患者,其中 216 例患者符合入组条件。每 2 周静脉滴注放线菌素 D 1.25mg/m²与每周肌内注射(IM)甲氨蝶呤 30mg/m²相比,具有统计学优势(CR:70%比 53%;P=0.01)。同样,在根据 2002 年 WHO 风险评分修订版定义的低危型 GTN 患者(风险评分为 0-4 分,且不包括绒毛膜癌)中,甲氨蝶呤组和放线菌素 D 组的缓解率分别为 58%和 73%(P=0.03)。如果 WHO 风险评分为 5 分或 6 分或诊断为绒毛膜癌,两种方案的疗效均较差(CR:9%和 42%)。有 2 例潜在复发,分别发生在第 4 个月(放线菌素 D 组)和第 22 个月(甲氨蝶呤组)。并非所有患者均完成随访。两种方案均具有良好的耐受性。

结论

对于一般可治愈的低危型 GTN,与每周 IM 甲氨蝶呤方案相比,每 2 周的放线菌素 D 方案具有更高的 CR 率。

相似文献

2
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;7(7):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub3.
3
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 9;2016(6):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub4.
5
First line chemotherapy in low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub2.
10
Outcome of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Jan;26(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

2
Fertility Sparing Medical Management Options in Gynecologic Cancers.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Mar;26(3):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01299-4. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3
Factors influencing serum hCG negativization timing in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):331-347. doi: 10.62347/HFRL7722. eCollection 2025.
4
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasm: Patient outcomes and clinical pearls from a multidisciplinary referral center.
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;192:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
5
Risk factors for methotrexate resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients (FIGO score 0-4).
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):1353-1362. doi: 10.62347/ZUCG8140. eCollection 2024.
6
Successful Management of Persistent Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Comprehensive Review and Case Analysis.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 26;15(12):e51112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51112. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
First-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a network meta-analysis.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 5;13:1276771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276771. eCollection 2023.
8
Genome mining of actinomycin shunt products from sp. YINM00002.
RSC Adv. 2023 Dec 12;13(51):36200-36208. doi: 10.1039/d3ra07277k. eCollection 2023 Dec 8.
9
Review of current literature on gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023 Nov 27;35(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43046-023-00195-y.
10
Challenges in treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in patients with MTHFR mutation: A case report.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jun 29;48:101234. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101234. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

5
Methotrexate infusion in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;183(6):1579-82. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108077.
6
Better treatments that cost more: the dilemma.
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Jul;78(1):1-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5885.
8
Treatment of low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors with single-agent chemotherapy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;174(6):1917-23; discussion 1923-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70229-6.
9
5-day methotrexate for women with metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease.
Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Jul;54(1):76-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1169.
10
Single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):574-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90575-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验