Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):683-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206cebf.
To evaluate the effect of a nursing-driven sedation protocol for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients on duration of use of analgesic and sedative medications. We hypothesized that a protocol would decrease length of sedation use and decrease days of mechanical ventilation and length of stay.
Retrospective cohort study with historical controls.
Thirty-one-bed tertiary care, medical-surgical-cardiac pediatric intensive care unit in a metropolitan university-affiliated children's hospital.
Children requiring mechanical ventilation longer than 48 hrs not meeting exclusion criteria.
Before protocol implementation, sedation was managed per individual physician orders. During the intervention period, analgesia and sedation were managed by nurses following an algorithm-based sedation protocol based on a comfort score.
The observation group included consecutive patients admitted during the 12-month period before protocol education and implementation (n = 153). The intervention group included patients admitted during the 12 months following protocol implementation (n = 166). The median duration of total sedation days (intravenous plus enteral) was 7 days for the observation period and 5 days for the intervention period (p = .026). Specifically, the median duration of morphine infusion was 6 days for the observation period and 5 days for the intervention period (p = .015), whereas the median duration of lorazepam infusion was 2 days for the observation period and 0 days for the intervention period. After adjusting for severity of illness with the pediatric risk of mortality III (PRISM III) score, the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that at any point in time, patients in the intervention group were 23% more likely to be off all sedation (heart rate 0.77, p = .020). Additionally, the intervention group tended to be associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation (heart rate 0.81, p = .060) and decreased pediatric intensive care unit length of stay (heart rate 0.81, p = .058), although these associations did not quite reach statistical significance.
A pediatric sedation protocol can significantly decrease days of benzodiazepine and opiate administration, which may improve pediatric intensive care unit resource utilization.
评估以护理为导向的镇静方案对机械通气儿科患者镇痛和镇静药物使用时间的影响。我们假设该方案将减少镇静使用时间,减少机械通气天数和住院时间。
回顾性队列研究,有历史对照。
位于大都市大学附属医院的 31 张病床的重症监护、外科-心脏儿科重症监护病房。
需要机械通气超过 48 小时且无排除标准的儿童。
在方案实施之前,镇静是根据个别医生的医嘱进行管理的。在干预期间,根据基于舒适度评分的算法镇静方案,由护士管理镇痛和镇静。
观察组包括在方案教育和实施前 12 个月内连续入院的患者(n = 153)。干预组包括在方案实施后 12 个月内入院的患者(n = 166)。观察期总镇静天数(静脉加肠内)中位数为 7 天,干预期为 5 天(p =.026)。具体而言,观察期吗啡输注中位数为 6 天,干预期为 5 天(p =.015),而观察期劳拉西泮输注中位数为 2 天,干预期为 0 天。调整儿科死亡率风险 III 评分(PRISM III)后,Cox 比例风险回归分析表明,在任何时间点,干预组患者停止所有镇静的可能性增加 23%(心率 0.77,p =.020)。此外,干预组与机械通气天数减少(心率 0.81,p =.060)和儿科重症监护病房住院时间缩短(心率 0.81,p =.058)相关,但这些关联尚未达到统计学意义。
儿科镇静方案可显著减少苯二氮䓬类和阿片类药物的使用天数,从而可能改善儿科重症监护病房资源的利用。