• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案对危重症儿童药物暴露及撤药的影响:一项系统评价

Impact of Nurse-Driven Analgesia and Sedation Protocols on Medication Exposure and Withdrawal in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Schianchi Laura, Harris Julia

机构信息

Paediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Centre, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese (MI), Italy.

Department of Children's Nursing, London South Bank University, London, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70051. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70051.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.70051
PMID:40438004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of analgesia and sedation is essential for patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, over-sedation can cause side effects, including iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS). The use of nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols may improve patient outcomes.

AIM

The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the use of such protocols can reduce opioid and benzodiazepine doses. Secondary outcome measures included documentation of pain and sedation scores, incidence of IWS, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and PICU/hospital length of stay (LOS).

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature was conducted, searching several databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete and Cochrane Library. Pertinent articles were selected according to pre-determined eligibility criteria. The internal validity of included studies was assessed using validated critical appraisal tools for quantitative research from the Cochrane Library. Narrative synthesis was utilised for data analysis due to the heterogeneity of study characteristics.

RESULTS

Nurse-led protocolised sedation significantly reduced the administered doses of benzodiazepines and the incidence of IWS. Moreover, the use of protocols significantly improved the documentation of pain and sedation scores across included studies. No significant difference in opioid use, duration of MV, and PICU/hospital LOS has been found. However, sub-group analyses for duration of MV and PICU/hospital LOS showed positive results in older children and those post-cardiac surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-driven analgesia and sedation protocols can reduce over-sedation and IWS in critically ill children. Further studies should explore the use of protocols in patient sub-groups where positive results have been reported.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurse-led analgesia and sedation protocols in PICU can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Effective implementation requires training and audits to boost nurses' confidence and autonomy.

摘要

背景

对于入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者,给予镇痛和镇静治疗至关重要。然而,过度镇静会导致副作用,包括医源性戒断综合征(IWS)。采用护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案可能会改善患者的治疗效果。

目的

本系统评价的主要目的是确定使用此类方案是否可以减少阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的剂量。次要结局指标包括疼痛和镇静评分的记录、IWS的发生率、机械通气(MV)时间以及PICU/住院时间(LOS)。

研究设计

对文献进行系统评价,检索了多个数据库,包括护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、学术搜索完整版数据库(Academic Search Complete)和考克兰图书馆(Cochrane Library)。根据预先确定的纳入标准选择相关文章。使用考克兰图书馆经过验证的定量研究批判性评价工具评估纳入研究的内部效度。由于研究特征的异质性,采用叙述性综合分析进行数据分析。

结果

护士主导的程序化镇静显著降低了苯二氮䓬类药物的给药剂量和IWS的发生率。此外,在纳入的研究中,使用方案显著改善了疼痛和镇静评分的记录。在阿片类药物使用、MV时间以及PICU/住院时间方面未发现显著差异。然而,对MV时间和PICU/住院时间的亚组分析显示,在年龄较大的儿童和心脏手术后的儿童中结果呈阳性。

结论

护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案可以减少危重症儿童的过度镇静和IWS。进一步的研究应探索在已报告有阳性结果的患者亚组中使用该方案。

与临床实践的相关性

PICU中护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案可以改善治疗效果并降低成本。有效的实施需要培训和审核,以增强护士的信心和自主性。

相似文献

1
Impact of Nurse-Driven Analgesia and Sedation Protocols on Medication Exposure and Withdrawal in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review.护士主导的镇痛和镇静方案对危重症儿童药物暴露及撤药的影响:一项系统评价
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70051. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70051.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
International Analgesia and Sedation Weaning and Withdrawal Practices in Critically Ill Adults: The Adult Iatrogenic Withdrawal Study in the ICU.国际危重病成人镇痛镇静减停和撤药实践:重症监护成人医源性撤药研究。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1502-1514. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005951. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.在机械通气的重症监护患者中,采用方案指导镇静与非方案指导镇静以缩短机械通气时间的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 7;1:CD009771. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009771.pub2.
5
Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.静脉输注咪达唑仑用于新生儿重症监护病房中婴儿的镇静
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD002052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002052.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Risk factors associated with iatrogenic opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and conceptual model.危重症儿科患者医源性阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物戒断的相关危险因素:一项系统评价和概念模型
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;16(2):175-83. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000306.
8
Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.对于需要有创机械通气的成年重症患者,每日中断镇静与不中断镇静的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;2014(7):CD009176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009176.pub2.
9
Alpha-2 agonists for sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care units: a systematic review.用于重症监护病房中机械通气成人镇静的α-2激动剂:一项系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(25):v-xx, 1-117. doi: 10.3310/hta20250.
10
BIS monitoring versus clinical assessment for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource utilization.在重症监护病房中,对机械通气的成人患者进行镇静时,脑电双频指数(BIS)监测与临床评估的比较及其对临床结局和资源利用的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 21;2(2):CD011240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011240.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for analgesia and sedation in critically ill children admitted to intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的危重症儿童镇痛和镇静的建议。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Feb 12;2(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00036-9.
2
Analgesia and sedation in critically ill pediatric patients: an update from the recent guidelines and point of view.危重症儿科患者的镇痛与镇静:近期指南更新及观点
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):2013-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04905-5. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Nurses' perception of pediatric pain and pain assessment in the Japanese PICU.
日本儿科重症监护病房护士对小儿疼痛及疼痛评估的认知
Pediatr Int. 2023 Jan;65(1):e15499. doi: 10.1111/ped.15499.
4
Management of routine postoperative pain for children undergoing cardiac surgery: a Paediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative Clinical Practice Guideline.心脏手术患儿术后常规疼痛的管理:一份儿科急性护理心脏病协作临床实践指南。
Cardiol Young. 2022 Dec;32(12):1881-1893. doi: 10.1017/S1047951122003559. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
5
Implementation Science in Pediatric Critical Care - Sedation and Analgesia Practices as a Case Study.儿科重症监护中的实施科学——以镇静和镇痛实践为例
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 4;10:864029. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.864029. eCollection 2022.
6
Trends in Time to Extubation for Pediatric Postoperative Cardiac Patients and Its Correlation With Changes in Clinical Outcomes: A Virtual PICU Database Study.儿科心脏术后患者拔管时间的趋势及其与临床结局变化的相关性:虚拟 PICU 数据库研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):544-554. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002950. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
7
2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility.2022 年危重症儿童患者疼痛、躁动、神经肌肉阻滞和谵妄预防和管理的危重病医学会临床实践指南:考虑 ICU 环境和早期活动
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 1;23(2):e74-e110. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002873.
8
Sedation protocols in the pediatric intensive care unit: fact or fiction?儿科重症监护病房的镇静方案:事实还是虚构?
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2814-2824. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-328.
9
"Difficult to Sedate": Successful Implementation of a Benzodiazepine-Sparing Analgosedation-Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated Children.“难以镇静”:在机械通气儿童中成功实施苯二氮䓬类药物节省型镇痛镇静方案
Children (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;8(5):348. doi: 10.3390/children8050348.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.