• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

屈伸位X线平片对创伤后治疗有帮助吗?

Do flexion extension plain films facilitate treatment after trauma?

作者信息

Duane Therèse M, Scarcella Nicholas, Cross Justin, Wolfe Luke G, Mayglothling Julie, Aboutanos Michel B, Whelan James F, Malhotra Ajai K, Ivatury Rao R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2010 Dec;76(12):1351-4.

PMID:21265348
Abstract

We hypothesized that flexion extension (FE) films do not facilitate the diagnosis or treatment of ligamentous injury of the cervical spine after blunt trauma. From January 2000 to December 2008 we reviewed all patients who underwent FE films and compared five-view plain films (5 view) and cervical spine CTC with FE in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury. There were 22,929 patients with blunt trauma and of these, 271 patients underwent 303 FE films. Average age was 39.6 years, Injury Severity Score was 10.8, Glasgow Coma Score was 14.1, lactate was 2.6 mmol/L, and hospital length of stay was 6 days. Compared with FE, 5 view and CTC had a sensitivity of 80 per cent (8 of 10), positive predictive value of 47.1 per cent (8 of 17), specificity of 96.55 per cent (252 of 261), and negative predictive value of 99.21 per cent (252 of 254). For purposes of analysis, incomplete and ambiguous FE films were listed as negative; however, 20.5 per cent (62 of 303) were incomplete and 9.2 per cent (28 of 303) were ambiguous. Management did not change for the 2 patients with missed ligament injuries. The 303 studies cost $162,105.00 to obtain. FEs are often incomplete and unreliable making it difficult to use them to base management decisions. They do not facilitate treatment and may lead to increased cost and prolonged cervical collars.

摘要

我们假设屈伸(FE)位X线片无助于钝性创伤后颈椎韧带损伤的诊断或治疗。从2000年1月至2008年12月,我们回顾了所有接受FE位X线片检查的患者,并比较了五视图平片(5 view)和颈椎CT三维重建(CTC)在韧带损伤诊断中的应用。共有22929例钝性创伤患者,其中271例患者接受了303次FE位X线片检查。平均年龄为39.6岁,损伤严重度评分(Injury Severity Score)为10.8,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(Glasgow Coma Score)为14.1,乳酸水平为2.6 mmol/L,住院时间为6天。与FE位X线片相比,5视图平片和CTC的敏感度为80%(10例中的8例),阳性预测值为47.1%(17例中的8例),特异度为96.55%(261例中的252例),阴性预测值为99.21%(254例中的252例)。为便于分析,将不完整和不明确的FE位X线片列为阴性;然而,20.5%(303例中的62例)为不完整,9.2%(303例中的28例)为不明确。2例漏诊韧带损伤的患者治疗方案未改变。获取这303项检查花费了162,105.00美元。FE位X线片常常不完整且不可靠,难以据此做出治疗决策。它们无助于治疗,可能导致费用增加和佩戴颈托时间延长。

相似文献

1
Do flexion extension plain films facilitate treatment after trauma?屈伸位X线平片对创伤后治疗有帮助吗?
Am Surg. 2010 Dec;76(12):1351-4.
2
Flexion-extension cervical spine plain films compared with MRI in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury.颈椎屈伸位X线平片与MRI在韧带损伤诊断中的比较
Am Surg. 2010 Jun;76(6):595-8.
3
Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.颈椎的五视图平片是否不可靠?对精神状态改变的钝性创伤患者的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 2003 Oct;55(4):658-63; discussion 663-4. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000088120.99247.4A.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of flexion-extension radiography for the detection of ligamentous cervical spine injury following a normal cervical spine computed tomography.在颈椎计算机断层扫描正常的情况下,屈伸位X线摄影对检测颈椎韧带损伤的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Aug;28(4):450-5. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12612. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?钝性颈椎损伤的影像学清除:X线平片还是计算机断层扫描?
J Trauma. 2003 Aug;55(2):222-6; discussion 226-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000083332.93868.E2.
6
False-negative plain cervical spine x-rays in blunt trauma.钝性创伤中颈椎X线平片的假阴性结果
Am Surg. 2003 Nov;69(11):1010-4.
7
Are flexion extension films necessary for cervical spine clearance in patients with neck pain after negative cervical CT scan?颈椎 CT 扫描阴性的颈痛患者,颈椎屈伸位片有必要作为颈椎减压的排除标准吗?
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):411-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.100. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
8
Computed tomographic scan: it's not just about the fracture.计算机断层扫描:其意义不止于骨折。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Oct;77(4):604-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000407.
9
Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma.颈椎屈伸位X线片在钝性创伤急性评估中的应用
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):426-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00005.
10
Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal?钝性创伤所致意识不清患者不稳定型颈椎损伤的排除:当多排探测器CT检查结果正常时,是否需要进行磁共振成像检查?
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):106-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371040697.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the intervertebral disk angle for the assessment of anterior cervical diskoligamentous injury.评估颈椎间盘韧带损伤时的椎间盘角度
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;34(12):2399-404. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3585. Epub 2013 Jun 13.