• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用日立 917 分析仪评估 QMS 依维莫司检测法:与液相色谱/质谱法的比较。

Evaluation of QMS everolimus assay using Hitachi 917 Analyzer: comparison with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Medical School in Houston and Laboratory Services, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Apr;33(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31820afc97.

DOI:10.1097/FTD.0b013e31820afc97
PMID:21266941
Abstract

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant requiring routine monitoring in whole blood. We evaluated the analytical performance of a new immunoassay for everolimus, Quantitative Microsphere System (QMS) everolimus (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which is CE marked and currently under review by Food and Drug Administration of the United States by comparing results with values obtained by using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The total coefficient of variations (CVs) were 8.3% for low control (mean: 3.8 ng/mL), 6.1% for the medium control (mean: 8.0 ng/mL), and 7.5% for the high control (mean: 14.4 ng/mL) (n = 80 for each control, run over 20 nonconsecutive days). The respective total CVs for patients' pool were 13.3% (mean: 4.0 ng/mL), 7.5% (mean: 8.2 ng/mL), and 8.7% (mean: 11.7 ng/mL) (n = 80 for each patient pool). The assay was linear from a whole-blood everolimus level between 1.5 and 20 ng/mL, and the limit of quantitation was 1.3 ng/mL. Comparison was carried out using 90 renal transplant patient samples, and we observed the following Passing and Bablok linear regression plot: y = 1.11, slope = -0.005 (R = 0.92). This assay was not affected by commonly used 70 drugs, but sirolimus, a drug structurally similar to everolimus, showed 46% cross-reactivity. We conclude that QMS everolimus immunoassay has adequate sensitivity and specificity for the determination of whole-blood everolimus and can be used for routine therapeutic drug monitoring.

摘要

依维莫司是一种免疫抑制剂,需要在全血中进行常规监测。我们通过比较与使用液相色谱/质谱法获得的值的结果,评估了新的依维莫司免疫分析物(定量微球系统(QMS)依维莫司(赛默飞世尔科技))的分析性能,该分析物已获得 CE 标志,并正在接受美国食品和药物管理局的审查。低对照品(平均值:3.8ng/ml)的总变异系数(CV)为 8.3%,中对照品(平均值:8.0ng/ml)的总 CV 为 6.1%,高对照品(平均值:14.4ng/ml)的总 CV 为 7.5%(n=80,每个对照品连续 20 天运行)。患者组的总 CV 分别为 13.3%(平均值:4.0ng/ml)、7.5%(平均值:8.2ng/ml)和 8.7%(平均值:11.7ng/ml)(n=80 个患者组)。该检测方法在全血依维莫司水平为 1.5 至 20ng/ml 之间呈线性,定量限为 1.3ng/ml。使用 90 个肾移植患者样本进行了比较,我们观察到以下通过和巴布洛克线性回归图:y=1.11,斜率=-0.005(R=0.92)。该检测方法不受常用的 70 种药物的影响,但结构上与依维莫司相似的西罗莫司的交叉反应性为 46%。我们得出结论,QMS 依维莫司免疫分析法具有足够的灵敏度和特异性,可用于全血依维莫司的测定,并可用于常规治疗药物监测。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of QMS everolimus assay using Hitachi 917 Analyzer: comparison with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.采用日立 917 分析仪评估 QMS 依维莫司检测法:与液相色谱/质谱法的比较。
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Apr;33(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31820afc97.
2
Analytical performance of QMS everolimus assay on ortho Vitros 5,1 FS fusion analyzer: measuring everolimus trough levels for solid organ transplant recipients.QMS依维莫司检测法在奥多Vitros 5,1 FS融合分析仪上的分析性能:测定实体器官移植受者的依维莫司谷浓度
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Apr;36(2):264-8. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182a3b3f6.
3
Evaluation of QMS everolimus assay using Indiko analyzer: comparison with an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.使用Indiko分析仪评估QMS依维莫司测定法:与超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法的比较
Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Apr;37(2):275-8. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000133.
4
Evaluation of performance of new, isotopically labeled internal standard ([13c2d4]RAD001) for everolimus using a novel high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method.采用新型高效液相色谱串联质谱法评价新型同位素标记内标 ([13c2d4]RAD001) 用于依维莫司的性能。
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Aug;33(4):460-3. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182219af8.
5
Analytical performance of a new liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric method for determination of everolimus concentrations in whole blood.一种新的液相色谱/串联质谱法测定全血中依维莫司浓度的分析性能。
Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Apr;34(2):222-6. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318246d515.
6
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry outperforms fluorescence polarization immunoassay in monitoring everolimus therapy in renal transplantation.液相色谱-串联质谱法在监测肾移植中依维莫司治疗方面优于荧光偏振免疫测定法。
Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Aug;32(4):413-9. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181e5c656.
7
Evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT i2000 sirolimus assay and comparison with the Abbott IMx sirolimus assay and an established liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.评估雅培 ARCHITECT i2000 西罗莫司检测法,并与雅培 IMx 西罗莫司检测法和已建立的液相色谱-串联质谱法进行比较。
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Aug;33(4):453-9. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182263981.
8
Comparison of everolimus QMS immunoassay on Architect ci4100 and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: lack of agreement in organ-transplanted patients.依维莫司定量微粒子酶免疫分析在贝克曼库尔特ci4100全自动生化分析仪与液相色谱/质谱联用仪上的比较:器官移植患者中的结果不一致
Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Apr;37(2):214-9. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000126.
9
High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection for therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus.采用紫外检测的高效液相色谱法用于依维莫司的治疗药物监测。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005 Feb 25;816(1-2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.11.016.
10
High-performance liquid chromatography versus immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus: comparison of two methods.用于西罗莫司测量的高效液相色谱法与免疫分析法:两种方法的比较
Transplant Proc. 2006 Jan-Feb;38(1):78-80. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term cross-validation of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring assays: the Zortracker study.依维莫司治疗药物监测检测的长期交叉验证:Zortracker研究
Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Jun;37(3):296-303. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000191.
2
Oral intake of curcumin markedly activated CYP 3A4: in vivo and ex-vivo studies.口服姜黄素可显著激活细胞色素P450 3A4:体内和体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 10;4:6587. doi: 10.1038/srep06587.