Laboratory of Molecular Hematopoiesis, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 18;6(1):e14524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014524.
Tissue specific patterns of methylated cytosine residues vary with age, can be altered by environmental factors, and are often abnormal in human disease yet the cellular consequences of DNA methylation are incompletely understood. Although the bodies of highly expressed genes are often extensively methylated in plants, the relationship between intragenic methylation and expression is less clear in mammalian cells. We performed genome-wide analyses of DNA methylation and gene expression to determine how the pattern of intragenic methylation correlates with transcription and to assess the relationship between methylation of exonic and intronic portions of the gene body. We found that dense exonic methylation is far more common than previously recognized or expected statistically, yet first exons are relatively spared compared to more downstream exons and introns. Dense methylation surrounding the transcription start site (TSS) is uncoupled from methylation within more downstream regions suggesting that there are at least two classes of intragenic methylation. Whereas methylation surrounding the TSS is tightly linked to transcriptional silencing, methylation of more downstream regions is unassociated with the magnitude of gene expression. Notably, we found that DNA methylation downstream of the TSS, in the region of the first exon, is much more tightly linked to transcriptional silencing than is methylation in the upstream promoter region. These data provide direct evidence that DNA methylation is interpreted dissimilarly in different regions of the gene body and suggest that first exon methylation blocks transcript initiation, or vice versa. Our data also show that once initiated, downstream methylation is not a significant impediment to polymerase extension. Thus, the consequences of most intragenic DNA methylation must extend beyond the modulation of transcription magnitude.Sequencing data and gene expression microarray data have been submitted to the GEO online database (accession number SRA012081.1). Supporting information including expanded methods and ten additional figures in support of the manuscript is provided.
组织特异性的甲基化胞嘧啶残基模式随年龄而变化,可受环境因素影响,并且在人类疾病中经常异常,但 DNA 甲基化的细胞后果仍不完全清楚。尽管植物中高表达基因的主体通常广泛甲基化,但在哺乳动物细胞中,基因内甲基化与表达之间的关系不太清楚。我们进行了全基因组的 DNA 甲基化和基因表达分析,以确定基因内甲基化模式与转录的相关性,并评估外显子和基因主体内含子部分的甲基化之间的关系。我们发现,密集的外显子甲基化比以前认识到的或统计学上预期的更为常见,但与更下游的外显子和内含子相比,第一个外显子相对免受影响。转录起始位点 (TSS) 周围的密集甲基化与更下游区域内的甲基化分离,这表明至少存在两种类型的基因内甲基化。尽管 TSS 周围的甲基化与转录沉默紧密相关,但更下游区域的甲基化与基因表达的幅度无关。值得注意的是,我们发现 TSS 下游,第一个外显子区域的 DNA 甲基化与转录沉默的紧密程度远高于上游启动子区域的甲基化。这些数据提供了直接证据,表明 DNA 甲基化在基因主体的不同区域被不同地解释,并表明第一个外显子的甲基化阻止了转录起始,或者反之亦然。我们的数据还表明,一旦启动,下游甲基化不是聚合酶延伸的显著障碍。因此,大多数基因内 DNA 甲基化的后果必须超出转录幅度的调节。测序数据和基因表达微阵列数据已提交给 GEO 在线数据库(注册号 SRA012081.1)。提供了支持本文的扩展方法和十个额外的支持性图片。