Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Cologne, Germany.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):3021-36. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21635. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
The differences between erroneous actions that are consciously perceived as errors and those that go unnoticed have recently become an issue in the field of performance monitoring. In EEG studies, error awareness has been suggested to influence the error positivity (Pe) of the response-locked event-related brain potential, a positive voltage deflection prominent approximately 300 msec after error commission, whereas the preceding error-related negativity (ERN) seemed to be unaffected by error awareness. Erroneous actions, in general, have been shown to promote several changes in ongoing autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, yet such investigations have only rarely taken into account the question of subjective error awareness. In the first part of this study, heart rate, pupillometry, and EEG were recorded during an antisaccade task to measure autonomic arousal and activity of the CNS separately for perceived and unperceived errors. Contrary to our expectations, we observed differences in both Pe and ERN with respect to subjective error awareness. This was replicated in a second experiment, using a modified version of the same task. In line with our predictions, only perceived errors provoke the previously established post-error heart rate deceleration. Also, pupil size yields a more prominent dilatory effect after an erroneous saccade, which is also significantly larger for perceived than unperceived errors. On the basis of the ERP and ANS results as well as brain-behavior correlations, we suggest a novel interpretation of the implementation and emergence of error awareness in the brain. In our framework, several systems generate input signals (e.g., ERN, sensory input, proprioception) that influence the emergence of error awareness, which is then accumulated and presumably reflected in later potentials, such as the Pe.
最近,在绩效监测领域,人们开始关注那些被有意识地感知为错误的行为与那些未被察觉的行为之间的差异。在脑电图研究中,错误意识被认为会影响反应锁定事件相关脑电位的错误正波(Pe),Pe 是一种大约在错误发生后 300 毫秒出现的正电压偏移,而之前的错误相关负波(ERN)似乎不受错误意识的影响。一般来说,错误行为会促进自主神经系统(ANS)活动的几个变化,但这些研究很少考虑到主观错误意识的问题。在这项研究的第一部分中,心率、瞳孔测量和脑电图在反扫视任务中被记录下来,以分别测量感知和未感知错误时自主神经系统的唤醒和中枢神经系统的活动。与我们的预期相反,我们观察到 Pe 和 ERN 都与主观错误意识有关。这在第二个实验中得到了重复,该实验使用了相同任务的修改版本。与我们的预测一致,只有感知到的错误才会引发先前建立的错误后心率减速。此外,瞳孔大小在错误扫视后会产生更明显的扩张效应,而对于感知到的错误,这种效应比未感知到的错误更大。基于 ERP 和 ANS 结果以及脑行为相关性,我们对大脑中错误意识的实施和出现提出了一种新的解释。在我们的框架中,几个系统会产生输入信号(例如,ERN、感觉输入、本体感觉),这些信号会影响错误意识的出现,然后错误意识会被积累,并可能反映在稍后的电位中,例如 Pe。