Suppr超能文献

言语语言病理学专业学生在基于问题的学习课程中的学习方法。

Speech-language pathology students' approaches to learning in a problem-based learning curriculum.

作者信息

Mok Cecilia K F, Dodd Barbara, Whitehill Tara L

机构信息

The University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11(6):472-81. doi: 10.3109/17549500903003052.

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) is hypothesized to enhance the development of deep learning. Most previous studies, however, have focused on outcomes (knowledge and skills) rather than students' approaches to learning, or how learning approach correlates with learning outcomes. Undergraduates in a speech-language pathology program (n = 114) completed the revised 2-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) twice in an academic year to identify their approaches to learning and to compare these results with academic outcomes. Two findings emerged. Although the mean of scores for the deep approach (DA) to learning was consistently higher than the mean of scores for the surface approach (SA) to learning, exposure to PBL led to significant increase in DA and SA to learning during an academic year for students in Years 1 to 3. Students who did well in a PBL examination showed a much stronger DA than SA to learning, while students who performed less well showed a smaller difference between DA and SA to learning. Possible explanations for these findings are evaluated and implications for further studies are discussed.

摘要

基于问题的学习(PBL)被认为能够促进深度学习的发展。然而,以往的大多数研究都集中在学习成果(知识和技能)上,而非学生的学习方法,或者学习方法与学习成果之间的关联。一个言语病理学专业的本科班级(n = 114)在一学年内两次完成修订后的两因素学习过程问卷(R-SPQ-2F),以确定他们的学习方法,并将这些结果与学业成绩进行比较。得出了两个结果。虽然深度学习方法(DA)的平均得分一直高于表面学习方法(SA)的平均得分,但对于1至3年级的学生来说,接触PBL导致他们在一学年内深度学习方法和表面学习方法的得分显著增加。在PBL考试中表现出色的学生在学习上表现出比表面学习方法更强的深度学习方法,而表现较差的学生在深度学习方法和表面学习方法之间的差异较小。对这些结果的可能解释进行了评估,并讨论了对进一步研究的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验