Suppr超能文献

提供儿童保健服务:一探门内世界。

Delivery of well-child care: a look inside the door.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the delivery of well-child care and its components; to compare that delivery with recommendations in Bright Futures; and to compare delivery of well-child care for children with special health care needs with that for children without special needs.

METHODS

Over a 10-week period, 2 medical students observed and documented characteristics of well-child care visits by general pediatricians and midlevel pediatric providers. Parents completed a demographic questionnaire and a screener for children with special health care needs.

RESULTS

A total of 483 visits by 43 pediatricians and 9 midlevel providers with patients from 0 to 19 years of age were observed. Adjusted mean visit duration was 20.3 minutes; 38.9% of visits began with an open-ended question about parent/child concerns. A mean of 7.2 health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics were addressed per visit. Clinicians addressed a mean of 42% of Bright Futures-recommended age-specific health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics. Topics addressed less frequently than recommended included family support, parental well-being, behavior/discipline, physical activity, media screen time, risk reduction/substance use, puberty/sex, social-peer interactions, and violence. Shorter visits were associated with asking about parent/child concerns and with addressing greater proportions of recommended health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics. Well-child care visits with children with special health care needs were 36% longer than those with children without special needs and addressed similar numbers of age-specific health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics. More time was spent with children with special health care needs addressing health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics, other conditions (usually their chronic condition), and testing, prescriptions, and referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing direct observation of visits with pediatric clinicians, we found that solicitation of parent/child concerns occurred less frequently than recommended. Fewer than half of recommended visit-specific health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics were addressed, and there was little congruence with some Bright Futures age group-specific recommendations. Notably, both solicitation of patient/parent concerns and greater adherence to health supervision/anticipatory guidance recommendations were associated with shorter visits. Well-child care visits with children with special health care needs were longer than those with children without special needs; more time was spent addressing similar numbers of health supervision/anticipatory guidance topics as well as their chronic conditions.

摘要

目的

描述儿童保健服务的提供情况及其组成部分;将其与“美好未来”中的建议进行比较;并比较有特殊医疗需求的儿童与无特殊需求的儿童的儿童保健服务提供情况。

方法

在 10 周的时间里,2 名医学生观察并记录了普通儿科医生和中级儿科医生提供的儿童保健服务就诊的特点。家长填写了一份人口统计问卷和一份有特殊健康需求儿童的筛查表。

结果

共观察了 43 名儿科医生和 9 名中级医生为 0 至 19 岁患者进行的 483 次就诊。调整后的平均就诊时间为 20.3 分钟;38.9%的就诊从家长/孩子关心的问题的开放式问题开始。每次就诊平均涉及 7.2 个健康监督/预期指导主题。医生每次就诊平均涉及 42%的“美好未来”推荐的特定年龄健康监督/预期指导主题。涉及较少的主题包括家庭支持、父母的幸福感、行为/纪律、体育活动、媒体屏幕时间、减少风险/药物使用、青春期/性、社交/同伴互动和暴力。就诊时间较短与询问家长/孩子的关心问题以及涉及更多比例的推荐健康监督/预期指导主题有关。有特殊医疗需求的儿童的就诊时间比没有特殊医疗需求的儿童长 36%,并且涉及到相似数量的特定年龄健康监督/预期指导主题。与有特殊医疗需求的儿童相比,他们花费更多的时间来处理健康监督/预期指导主题、其他疾病(通常是他们的慢性疾病)以及测试、处方和转诊。

结论

通过对儿科医生就诊的直接观察,我们发现征求家长/孩子的意见比建议的要少。不到一半的推荐就诊特定健康监督/预期指导主题得到了处理,并且与一些“美好未来”年龄组特定建议几乎没有一致性。值得注意的是,征求患者/家长的意见以及更严格地遵守健康监督/预期指导建议与就诊时间较短有关。有特殊医疗需求的儿童的就诊时间比没有特殊医疗需求的儿童长;他们花更多的时间来处理相似数量的健康监督/预期指导主题以及他们的慢性疾病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验