Department of Psychiatry, Dr Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Kerala 695504, India.
J Crit Care. 2011 Apr;26(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
Delirium is a common, difficult-to-diagnose clinical condition in critical care units. The lack of recognition of delirium often results in increased morbidity and mortality. The study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) in a resource-poor medical intensive care setting in South India.
Fifty-three patients admitted into the medical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital who were neither mute nor intubated were recruited for the study. Trained residents administered the ICDSC to screen for delirium. A consultant psychiatrist used the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnostic criteria for research to determine the presence of delirium.
The optimal threshold for screening, as ICDSC total score of 3 or more, was obtained by using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Although a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 74%, respectively, were obtained at the original cutoff of 4, a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 61.54% were achieved with a cutoff of 3. In a subsample of 21 patients, interrater reliability was evaluated and found to be 0.947 (95% confidence interval, 0.870-0.979). The ICDSC had good internal consistency, with Cronbach α of .754 and Guttman split-half coefficient of 0.71. Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor structure, namely, altered sensorium/psychopathology and sleep-wake cycle problems.
Our findings indicate that in nonintubated intensive care unit patients, the ICDSC can be used to screen for delirium but should not be used as a diagnostic instrument in this patient population and that residents can be trained in the use of the instrument in resource-poor critical care settings. Using a different threshold for positivity of 3 rather than 4 appeared to offer improved screening characteristics in this resource-poor critical care setting.
谵妄是重症监护病房中一种常见且难以诊断的临床病症。由于对谵妄的识别不足,往往会导致发病率和死亡率增加。本研究旨在确定在印度南部资源匮乏的医疗重症监护病房中,密集护理谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC)的有效性和可靠性。
研究纳入了 53 名入住教学医院医疗重症监护病房的患者,这些患者既不是哑巴也没有插管。经过培训的住院医师使用 ICDSC 对谵妄进行筛查。一位顾问精神科医生使用国际疾病分类,第 10 版研究诊断标准来确定谵妄的存在。
通过受试者工作特征曲线,获得了最佳的筛查阈值,即 ICDSC 总分 3 或更多。尽管在原始截断值 4 时,灵敏度和特异性分别为 75%和 74%,但在截断值 3 时,灵敏度为 90%,特异性为 61.54%。在 21 名患者的亚样本中,评估了内部一致性,并发现其为 0.947(95%置信区间,0.870-0.979)。ICDSC 具有良好的内部一致性,克朗巴赫 α 值为 0.754,古特曼半分系数为 0.71。因子分析显示存在 2 个因子结构,即意识改变/精神病理学和睡眠-觉醒周期问题。
我们的研究结果表明,在非插管重症监护病房患者中,ICDSC 可用于筛查谵妄,但不应将其作为该患者人群的诊断工具,并且可以在资源匮乏的重症监护环境中对居民进行该工具的使用培训。在这个资源匮乏的重症监护环境中,使用阳性阈值 3 而不是 4 似乎可以提高筛查特征。