Suppr超能文献

纪念谵妄评估量表的验证。

Validation of memorial delirium assessment scale.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences 641014, Coimbatore, India.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2009 Dec;24(4):530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.12.016. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Delirium is common but underdiagnosed in critical care units, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of diagnosing delirium with the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive patients admitted to medical and cardiac intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital, who were neither mute nor intubated, participated in this study. A trained junior resident screened for delirium using MDAS. A consultant psychiatrist established the reference diagnosis of delirium in accordance with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnostic criteria for research.

RESULTS

Interrater agreement and test-retest reliability of MDAS were 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.96) and 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.97), respectively. The MDAS had good internal consistency, with Cronbach alpha of .89 and Guttman split-half coefficient of 0.71. Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor structure, namely, cognitive disturbances and behavioral abnormalities. A receiver operating characteristic curve obtained the optimal threshold for screening as MDAS total score of at least 10. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 95.45%, 75%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that training junior residents to use a brief screening instrument to diagnose delirium is a reliable and valid option in resource-poor critical care settings.

摘要

目的

谵妄在重症监护病房很常见,但诊断不足,这导致发病率和死亡率增加。本研究旨在评估使用纪念谵妄评估量表(MDAS)在印度诊断谵妄的可靠性和有效性。

材料和方法

120 名连续入住三级医院内科和心脏重症监护病房、既非聋哑又未插管的患者参与了这项研究。一名经过培训的初级住院医师使用 MDAS 筛查谵妄。一名顾问精神科医生根据国际疾病分类第 10 版研究诊断标准确定谵妄的参考诊断。

结果

MDAS 的组内一致性和重测信度分别为 0.92(95%置信区间,0.81-0.96)和 0.93(95%置信区间,0.83-0.97)。MDAS 具有良好的内部一致性,Cronbach α 为 0.89,Guttman 半分系数为 0.71。因子分析显示出 2 个因子结构,即认知障碍和行为异常。获得的最佳截断值为 MDAS 总分至少为 10,此时用于筛查的受试者工作特征曲线。其灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 100%、95.45%、75%和 100%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,培训初级住院医师使用简短的筛查工具来诊断谵妄是资源匮乏的重症监护环境中可靠和有效的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验