Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 26;31(4):1193-203. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1379-10.2011.
Human cortical excitability can be modified by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), but the cellular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we show that the pattern of delivery of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) (continuous versus intermittent) differently modifies electric activity and protein expression in the rat neocortex. Intermittent TBS (iTBS), but not continuous TBS (cTBS), enhanced spontaneous neuronal firing and EEG gamma band power. Sensory evoked cortical inhibition increased only after iTBS, although both TBS protocols increased the first sensory response arising from the resting cortical state. Changes in the cortical expression of the calcium-binding proteins parvalbumin (PV) and calbindin D-28k (CB) indicate that changes in spontaneous and evoked cortical activity following rTMS are in part related to altered activity of inhibitory systems. By reducing PV expression in the fast-spiking interneurons, iTBS primarily affected the inhibitory control of pyramidal cell output activity, while cTBS, by reducing CB expression, more likely affected the dendritic integration of synaptic inputs controlled by other classes of inhibitory interneurons. Calretinin, the third major calcium-binding protein expressed by another class of interneurons was not affected at all. We conclude that different patterns of TBS modulate the activity of inhibitory cell classes differently, probably depending on the synaptic connectivity and the preferred discharge pattern of these inhibitory neurons.
经重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可调节人类皮质兴奋性,但细胞机制尚不清楚。本文表明,θ爆发刺激(TBS)的传递模式(连续与间歇)可不同地调节大鼠新皮质的电活动和蛋白表达。间歇 TBS(iTBS)而非连续 TBS(cTBS)增强了自发神经元放电和 EEG γ频带功率。仅在 iTBS 后才会增加感觉诱发皮质抑制,尽管两种 TBS 方案均增加了源自静息皮质状态的第一感觉反应。皮质中钙结合蛋白(PV 和 CB)的表达变化表明 rTMS 后皮质自发和诱发活动的变化部分与抑制系统活性的改变有关。通过减少快速放电中间神经元中的 PV 表达,iTBS 主要影响锥体细胞输出活动的抑制控制,而 cTBS 通过减少 CB 表达,更可能影响由其他抑制性中间神经元控制的突触输入的树突整合。钙结合蛋白 3(calretinin),另一种中间神经元表达的第三大钙结合蛋白,未受到任何影响。我们得出结论,不同的 TBS 模式以不同的方式调节抑制性细胞类别的活性,这可能取决于这些抑制性神经元的突触连接和首选放电模式。