• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。

A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.

作者信息

Raghunath Reddy M H, Subba Reddy V V, Basappa N

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Uttar Pradesh Dental College & Hospital, Faizabad Road, Lucknow, Utter Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150.

DOI:10.4103/0970-4388.76150
PMID:21273711
Abstract

An in vitro study was conducted to compare the retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements using Instron universal testing machine. Thirty preformed and pretrimmed stainless steel crowns were used for cementation on 30 extracted human primary molars which were divided into three groups of 10 teeth in each group. Then the teeth were stored in artificial saliva and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. A load was applied on to the crown and was gradually increased till the crown showed dislodgement, and then the readings were recorded using Instron recorder and analyzed for statistical significance. The surface area of crown was measured by graphical method. The retentive strength was expressed in terms of kg/cm 2 , which was calculated by the equation load divided by area. Retentive strengths of zinc phosphate (ranged from a minimum of 16.93 to amaximum of 28.13 kg/cm 2 with mean of 21.28 kg/cm 2 ) and glass ionomer cement (minimum of 13.69 - 28.15 kg/cm 2 with mean of 20.69 kg/cm 2 ) were greater than that of polycarboxylate cement (minimum of 13.26 - 22.69 kg/cm 2 with mean of 16.79 kg/cm 2 ). Negligible difference (0.59 kg/cm 2 ) of retentive strength was observed between zinc phosphate (21.28 kg/cm 2 ) and glass ionomer cements (20.69 kg/cm 2 ). Glass ionomer cements can be recommended for cementation of stainless steel crowns because of its advantages and the retentive strength was almost similar to that of zinc phosphate cement.

摘要

采用英斯特朗万能试验机进行了一项体外研究,以比较磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀的固位强度。使用30个预制和预修整的不锈钢冠,在30颗拔除的人类乳牙上进行黏固,这些乳牙被分为三组,每组10颗牙。然后将牙齿保存在人工唾液中,并在37°C下孵育24小时。对牙冠施加负荷并逐渐增加,直到牙冠出现脱位,然后使用英斯特朗记录仪记录读数并进行统计学显著性分析。通过图形法测量牙冠的表面积。固位强度以kg/cm²表示,通过负荷除以面积的公式计算得出。磷酸锌水门汀的固位强度(范围为最小值16.93至最大值28.13 kg/cm²,平均值为21.28 kg/cm²)和玻璃离子水门汀(最小值13.69 - 28.15 kg/cm²,平均值为20.69 kg/cm²)大于聚羧酸锌水门汀(最小值13.26 - 22.69 kg/cm²,平均值为16.79 kg/cm²)。观察到磷酸锌水门汀(21.28 kg/cm²)和玻璃离子水门汀(20.69 kg/cm²)之间的固位强度差异可忽略不计(0.59 kg/cm²)。由于其优点,玻璃离子水门汀可推荐用于不锈钢冠的黏固,并且其固位强度与磷酸锌水门汀几乎相似。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150.
2
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1998 Mar;16(1):9-11.
3
The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.固位沟、喷砂处理及黏固剂类型对乳第二磨牙不锈钢全冠固位强度的影响——一项体外对比研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jan-Mar;30(1):19-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.95570.
4
Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.玻璃离子水门汀、磷酸锌水门汀和聚羧酸锌水门汀在预成不锈钢冠中的固位[纠正为预防]效果:一项比较临床研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Jun;20(2):41-6.
5
Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.使用三种不同黏固剂对正畸带环的固位情况
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995 Winter;19(2):127-30.
6
The effect of recementation on crown retention.重新黏固对冠修复体固位的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Mar-Apr;11(2):177-82.
7
Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.用于微固位牙冠修复体的粘结水门汀的比较
Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):95-100.
8
Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠用粘结性和非粘结性粘结水门汀的微渗漏
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.
9
The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.一种树脂基封闭剂对三种粘结剂粘结牙冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):428-35. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304000770.
10
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of Pediatric BioFlx Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns Using Different Types of Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.使用不同类型黏固剂时儿童BioFlx冠与不锈钢冠的固位情况:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(6):1287. doi: 10.3390/ma18061287.
2
In vitro comparison of microleakage with two different techniques of placing stainless steel crowns on mandibular deciduous first molar teeth with decreased mesiodistal width.对两种不同技术在下颌第一乳磨牙近远中宽度减小情况下放置不锈钢冠的微渗漏进行体外比较。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Winter;16(1):35-39. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.006. Epub 2022 May 29.
3
Cement selection criteria for full coverage restorations: A comprehensive review of literature.
全冠修复体的粘结剂选择标准:文献综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e1154-e1161. doi: 10.4317/jced.58671. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Bond strength and microleakage of different types of cements in stainless steel crown of primary molar teeth.乳牙不锈钢冠中不同类型粘结剂的粘结强度和微渗漏
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Jul 19;18:58. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An study.四种粘结水门汀与不锈钢冠用于乳磨牙固位强度的评估:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 May-Jun;15(3):201-207.
6
Effect of tooth preparation on microleakage of stainless steel crowns placed on primary mandibular first molars with reduced mesiodistal dimension.牙体预备对放置于近远中径减小的下颌第一乳磨牙上的不锈钢冠微渗漏的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jan;12(1):18-24.