• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于微固位牙冠修复体的粘结水门汀的比较

Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.

作者信息

Browning William D, Nelson Stephen K, Cibirka Roman, Myers Michael L

机构信息

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia, School of Dentistry, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, Georgia 30912-1260, USA.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):95-100.

PMID:11890033
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of resin, glass-ionomer, and zinc phosphate cements under adverse conditions.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Thirty extracted teeth were mounted and prepared in their long axis. The axial wall height was 3 mm and the convergence angle was 28 degrees. These conditions increased the role of the cement and decreased the role of the preparation in providing retention of the casting. The axial surface area was determined. Copings were fabricated with a ring aligned in the long axis to facilitate removal of the crown. They were cemented with a resin cement, a glass-ionomer cement, or a zinc phosphate cement. A block randomization scheme was used to assign cements so that the mean surface areas of the teeth were equivalent in all groups. The copings were loaded in tension, and the amount of force required to remove the coping was recorded. The stress required to remove the coping was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean stress required to remove the copings was 9.4, 5.0, and 3.1 MPa for the resin, glass-ionomer, and zinc phosphate cements, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The resin cement group was significantly stronger than both the glass-ionomer cement and the zinc phosphate cement groups. The glass-ionomer cement was significantly stronger than the zinc phosphate cement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在不利条件下树脂、玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀的固位强度。

方法与材料

选取30颗离体牙,沿其长轴进行预备。轴壁高度为3mm,聚合角为28度。这些条件增加了水门汀的作用,同时减少了预备体在提供铸件固位方面的作用。测定轴面面积。制作带有沿长轴排列的环的冠内修复体,以便于去除全冠。分别用树脂水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀或磷酸锌水门汀进行粘结。采用区组随机化方案分配水门汀,以使所有组中牙齿的平均表面积相等。对冠内修复体施加拉力,并记录去除冠内修复体所需的力的大小。计算去除冠内修复体所需的应力。

结果

树脂水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀去除冠内修复体所需的平均应力分别为9.4MPa、5.0MPa和3.1MPa。

结论

树脂水门汀组显著强于玻璃离子水门汀组和磷酸锌水门汀组。玻璃离子水门汀显著强于磷酸锌水门汀。

相似文献

1
Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.用于微固位牙冠修复体的粘结水门汀的比较
Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):95-100.
2
The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.一种树脂基封闭剂对三种粘结剂粘结牙冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):428-35. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304000770.
3
The effect of recementation on crown retention.重新黏固对冠修复体固位的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Mar-Apr;11(2):177-82.
4
Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.使用三种不同类型的粘结剂对氧化锆陶瓷冠进行固位
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001.
5
Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.使用氧化锌/丁香酚封闭剂进行根管充填后,五种粘结水门汀对预制桩钉的固位强度:1. 充填后一周进行桩钉预备/粘结。
J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;11(3):168-75.
6
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.
7
Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.粘固于种植体基台上的铸造冠内冠的固位情况。
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):332-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00075.x.
8
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150.
9
In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.粘接水门汀和全冠基底材料的体外微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):292-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113705.
10
Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.黏固后种植体固位冠的可取出性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1304-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01587.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of compressive and adhesive strengths of a hybrid ceramic and 5Y-PSZ zirconia cemented with three different materials.评估用三种不同材料粘结的混合陶瓷和5Y-PSZ氧化锆的抗压强度和粘结强度。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Aug;133(4):e70017. doi: 10.1111/eos.70017. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Effect of Incisal Porcelain Veneering Thickness on the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Zirconia All-Ceramic Anterior Crowns.切端瓷贴面厚度对CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷前牙冠抗折性能的影响
Int J Dent. 2019 Aug 26;2019:6548519. doi: 10.1155/2019/6548519. eCollection 2019.
3
Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An study.
四种粘结水门汀与不锈钢冠用于乳磨牙固位强度的评估:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 May-Jun;15(3):201-207.
4
Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种新型自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的不锈钢冠的评价
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Effect of metal type and surface treatment on shear bond strength of resin cement (in vitro study).金属类型和表面处理对树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响(体外研究)。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):49-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164882.
6
Effect of preparation convergence on retention of multiple unit restorations - An in vitro study.预备聚合度对多单位修复体固位的影响——一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):409-13. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.161904.
7
Effect of axial groove and resin luting cements on the retention of complete cast metal crowns.轴沟及树脂粘结水门汀对全冠铸造金属冠固位力的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009 Spring;6(1):39-45.
8
Effects of Er:YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys.铒:钇铝石榴石激光处理对贱金属合金表面粗糙度的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0844-3. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
Influence of type of luting cement used with all-ceramic crowns on load capability of post-restored endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.全瓷冠修复时使用的粘结水门汀类型对根管治疗后的上颌中切牙桩核修复体承载能力的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Jun;12(2):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0164-6. Epub 2007 Nov 27.