Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.
QJM. 2011 Jul;104(7):571-4. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr005. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Diabetes care delivery in rural Africa is difficult. Problems include lack of dedicated personnel, monitoring systems, laboratory support and drugs. Few structured intervention projects have been undertaken, none with long-term follow-up.
To determine the long-term (4 years) glycaemic outcome of a structured nurse-led intervention programme for type 2 diabetic patients in rural Africa.
Single-centre, observational cohort study.
The programme was delivered in the scattered primary health clinics of Hlabisa District, in northern Kwazulu Natal, South Africa. Monthly diabetic clinics were held at which empowerment-based education was delivered and regularly reinforced. Oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) were titrated according to a previously validated clinical algorithm. Outcome was measured by glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1)c), as well as body mass index (BMI). Data were collected at baseline, and then 6, 18, 24 and 48 month's post-intervention.
Eighty patients had data available at all time collection points. They were of mean ± SD, age 56 ± 11 years, 70% were female, BMI 31.5 ± 7.2 kg/m(2) and HbA(1)c 10.8 ± 4.2%. HbA(1)c fell significantly to 8.1 ± 2.2% at 6 months and 7.5 ± 2.0% at 18 months. By 24 months, it had risen (8.4 ± 2.3%), and at 4 years post-intervention it was 9.7 ± 4.0% (still significantly lower than baseline, P = 0.015). BMI rose significantly at 6 and 18 months, but by 48 months was not significantly different from baseline.
We conclude that the intervention led to marked HbA(1)c improvements up to 18 months follow-up, but thereafter there was 'glycaemic slippage'. This may be not only due to educational 'wear-off', noted in other education-intervention programmes, but also to the expected glycaemic deterioration with time known to occur in type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, 4-year HbA(1)c levels were still significantly lower than at baseline. The programme was also well received by staff and patients, and we believe is an appropriate and effective diabetes intervention system in rural Africa.
在非洲农村,糖尿病的护理工作难以开展。所面临的问题包括专业人员、监测系统、实验室支持和药物的缺乏。虽然已经开展了一些结构化干预项目,但都没有进行长期随访。
评估在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省北部 Hlabisa 区农村实施的以护士为主导的结构化 2 型糖尿病患者干预项目的长期(4 年)血糖控制效果。
单中心、观察性队列研究。
该项目在 Hlabisa 区的分散初级卫生保健诊所开展,每月举办一次糖尿病患者诊所,提供以赋权为基础的教育,并定期强化。根据之前验证的临床算法调整口服降糖药物(OHA)的剂量。通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和体重指数(BMI)来衡量治疗效果。在基线、干预后 6、18、24 和 48 个月时收集数据。
80 例患者在所有时间点都有数据。这些患者的平均年龄为 56±11 岁,70%为女性,BMI 为 31.5±7.2kg/m2,HbA1c 为 10.8±4.2%。HbA1c 在 6 个月时显著下降至 8.1±2.2%,18 个月时降至 7.5±2.0%。24 个月时,HbA1c 有所上升(8.4±2.3%),而在干预后 4 年时为 9.7±4.0%(仍显著低于基线,P=0.015)。BMI 在 6 个月和 18 个月时显著升高,但在 48 个月时与基线相比无显著差异。
我们的研究表明,该干预措施在 18 个月的随访中显著降低了 HbA1c,但此后出现了“血糖漂移”。这可能不仅是由于其他教育干预项目中提到的教育“消退”,还可能是由于 2 型糖尿病随时间推移而发生的预期血糖恶化。尽管如此,4 年时的 HbA1c 水平仍显著低于基线。该项目也得到了工作人员和患者的认可,我们认为这是一种适合并能有效管理非洲农村地区糖尿病的干预系统。