Suppr超能文献

四种方法评估生物膜发育的比较。

Comparison of four methods to assess biofilm development.

机构信息

Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, CNRS, Nancy Université, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(3):432-9. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.239.

Abstract

Two nondestructive methods of biofilm quantification (optical density via a flatbed scanner and biofilm thickness) have been evaluated and compared to two destructive methods (Crystal Violet staining after biofilm disintegration and dry weight). The methods were tested on biofilms that developed on a modified rotating biological contactor (RBC) that was inoculated with urban wastewater and fed with a synthetic medium that mimicked slaughterhouse wastewater. The results of the different methods were highly correlated (coefficient of correlation greater than 0.8). This validation experiment confirms the ability of the scanning method to easily monitor the biofilm's development over large surfaces without destruction of the biofilm.

摘要

两种非破坏性生物膜定量方法(通过平板扫描仪测量光密度和生物膜厚度)已被评估,并与两种破坏性方法(生物膜破坏后的结晶紫染色和干重)进行了比较。这些方法在经过改良的旋转生物接触器(RBC)上形成的生物膜上进行了测试,该接触器接种了城市废水,并使用模拟屠宰废水的合成培养基进行了喂养。不同方法的结果高度相关(相关系数大于 0.8)。该验证实验证实了扫描方法无需破坏生物膜即可轻松监测大面积生物膜发展的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验