二十一世纪机器人手术时代下 Piver-Rutledge Ⅲ型根治性子宫切除术及 FIGO ⅠA、ⅠB1 和ⅠB2 期宫颈癌的作用：个人观点。
The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.
机构信息
Department of Gynecology, Sisters of Charity Hospital, Buffalo, NY, USA.
出版信息
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec 30;21(4):219-24. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.219. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
Abstract
Type III radical hysterectomy reported in 1974 by Piver, Rutledge, and Smith is considered worldwide by many as the standard surgical therapy for invasive cervical carcinoma stage IB and IIA. With the increasing number of robotic surgeries being performed for early stage cervical cancer worldwide, the purpose of the paper is to present our personal perspective of the 21st century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy for stage IB cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery using the da Vinci robot.
摘要
1974 年，Piver、Rutledge 和 Smith 报道了 III 型根治性子宫切除术，被许多人认为是治疗浸润性宫颈癌 IB 期和 IIA 期的标准手术疗法。随着全球越来越多的机器人手术用于早期宫颈癌，本文旨在探讨在机器人手术时代，使用达芬奇机器人，我们对 Piver-Rutledge 型 III 根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB 期宫颈癌的 21 世纪作用的个人观点。
相似文献
1
The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Dec 30;21(4):219-24. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.219. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
2
The 21st century role of Piver type II hysterectomy in FIGO stage IA, IB cervical cancer: a personal perspective.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(2):109-13.
3
Sexual function after modified radical hysterectomy (Piver II/Type B) vs. classic radical hysterectomy (Piver III/Type C2) for early stage cervical cancer. A prospective study.
J Sex Med. 2012 Mar;9(3):909-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02581.x.
4
Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Feb;21(2):355-62. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820731bb.
5
Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;38(3):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.017. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
6
[The Wertheim-Meigs radical hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma].
Med Pregl. 2001 Sep-Oct;54(9-10):465-9.
7
Class I hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 cervical cancer.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):494-500. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76832. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
9
Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jan;80(1):3-12. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6010.
10
[Surgical therapy of the uterine cervix carcinoma in Ib2 stage].
Ginekol Pol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1153-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Postoperative pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduced the incidence of late gastrointestinal complications for uterine cervical cancer patients.
J Radiat Res. 2019 Oct 23;60(5):650-657. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz041.
2
Surgical manual of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group: classification of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;28(1):e5. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e5. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Lower urinary tract dysfunction and quality of life in cervical cancer survivors after concurrent chemoradiation versus radical hysterectomy.
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2151-6. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
4
Comparison of outcomes between radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy versus primary chemoradiation therapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(4):226-34. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.226. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):438-42. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181cf5c2c.
2
Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
3
Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Dec;76(6):567-76. doi: 10.1002/msj.20149.
4
Advances in surgical management of cervical cancer.
Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Jun;61(3):227-37.
5
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):107-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
6
Robotic radical hysterectomy: a new standard of care?
Future Oncol. 2009 Feb;5(1):23-5. doi: 10.2217/14796694.5.1.23.
7
Robotic radical hysterectomy.
Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Feb;61(1):53-5.
8
Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.031. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
9
Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;21(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32831ffe8e.
10
Robotic surgery for cervical cancer.
Yonsei Med J. 2008 Dec 31;49(6):879-85. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.879.
Zotero 插件