Can Fam Physician. 1984 Nov;30:2362-6.
A critical review of the literature reveals several facts which are important in helping the rural physician decide where and how patients with myocardial infarction should be treated. The effectiveness of coronary care units has not been well established, even for patients admitted during the early phase of the disease; they do not benefit the majority of patients admitted five or more hours after the onset of symptoms. Transporting patients over relatively long distances during the early phase results in increased mortality. The survival rates for patients treated in small hospitals is quite comparable to that of patients treated in coronary care units. The majority of rural patients with myocardial infarction are therefore more appropriately treated in a small local hospital than by being transferred to a coronary care unit. Those coronary care units which have been established in small hospitals do not appear to have reduced mortality. Patients with myocardial infarction who are being treated in small hospitals should be observed carefully, but electronic monitoring should be used only when there is a specific indication.
文献回顾揭示了一些重要事实,有助于农村医生决定心肌梗死患者应该在哪里以及如何接受治疗。即使对于在疾病早期入院的患者,冠心病监护病房的疗效也尚未得到充分证实;它们并不能使大多数在症状出现五小时或更长时间后入院的患者受益。在疾病早期将患者长途转运会导致死亡率增加。在小医院接受治疗的患者的存活率与在冠心病监护病房接受治疗的患者相当。因此,大多数农村心肌梗死患者在当地小医院接受治疗比转至冠心病监护病房更为合适。那些在小医院设立的冠心病监护病房似乎并没有降低死亡率。在小医院接受治疗的心肌梗死患者应密切观察,但只有在有具体指征时才应使用电子监测。