• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节表面置换术后 5 年的高翻修率。

High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2598-604. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1792-3. Epub 2011 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-011-1792-3
PMID:21279484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3148364/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: There is growing evidence that different resurfacing implants are associated with variable survival and revision rates. A registry analysis indicated the Durom resurfacing implant had high revision rates at 5 years, whereas three original studies reported low revision rates at short-term followups. Thus, the revision rates appear controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore assessed (1) the survivorship including differences between women and men at a mean of 5 years after resurfacing with the Durom implant, and (2) clinical scores and radiographic parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively followed all 100 Durom hip resurfacings implanted in 91 patients (25 women and 66 men; mean age, 52 years) between 2003 and 2004. Survivorship analysis was performed with pending revision or revision for any reason as the endpoint. The minimum followup was 47 months (mean, 60 months; range, 47-72 months).

RESULTS

At a mean of 5 years, 11 hips were revised for various reasons. Cumulative survival was 88.2% for all patients and 81.5% for women. The mean Oxford (OHS) and Harris hip (HHS) scores were 14.6 and 94.7, respectively. The mean UCLA activity level was 7.9. Sclerotic changes around the short femoral stem (pedestal sign) were detected in 40% of the hips. We observed considerable femoral neck thinning with component-to-neck ratios of 0.85 preoperatively and 0.82 at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights a high revision rate 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant. This observation underlines previous findings from registry data and suggests that revision rates increase with time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景/理由:越来越多的证据表明,不同的表面置换植入物与不同的生存率和翻修率有关。一项注册分析表明,Durom 表面置换植入物在 5 年内的翻修率较高,而三项原始研究报告在短期随访中翻修率较低。因此,翻修率似乎存在争议。

问题/目的:因此,我们评估了(1)Durom 植入物表面置换后 5 年的生存率,包括男女之间的差异,以及(2)临床评分和影像学参数。

患者和方法

我们前瞻性地随访了 2003 年至 2004 年间植入的 100 例 Durom 髋关节表面置换患者(91 例患者,25 例女性,66 例男性;平均年龄 52 岁)。以等待翻修或任何原因的翻修为终点进行生存分析。最低随访时间为 47 个月(平均 60 个月;范围 47-72 个月)。

结果

平均 5 年后,11 髋因各种原因接受了翻修。所有患者的累积生存率为 88.2%,女性为 81.5%。平均牛津(OHS)和哈里斯髋关节(HHS)评分分别为 14.6 和 94.7。平均 UCLA 活动水平为 7.9。在 40%的髋关节中发现了股骨短干周围的硬化改变(基座征)。我们观察到术前组件-颈部比值为 0.85,5 年后为 0.82,股骨颈明显变薄。

结论

我们的研究强调了 Durom 髋关节表面置换术后 5 年的高翻修率。这一观察结果强调了来自注册数据的先前发现,并表明翻修率随时间增加而增加。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗研究。欲了解完整的证据水平描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.髋关节表面置换术后 5 年的高翻修率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2598-604. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1792-3. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
2
Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?使用关节表面置换假体进行髋关节表面置换术后,女性进行翻修手术的风险是否更高?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4860-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.金属对金属髋关节表面置换翻修术后10年时生存率低且并发症频繁。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):304-314. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4882-4.
4
Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.年轻患者行伯明翰半髋关节表面置换术时频繁出现股骨颈骨溶解。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3770-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4348-0.
5
What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?髋关节表面置换术后中期生存率和功能如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3221-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1438-x.
6
High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.非骨水泥型股骨柄与皮质支撑异体骨移植用于翻修全髋关节置换术中大股骨骨缺损的高生存率
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):2990-3000. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4358-y. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.20岁以下患者的陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换植入物
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4546-9. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.锥形植入物能否成功解决初次全髋关节置换术中的复杂解剖结构问题?早期随访的X线片和髋关节评分
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4480-x.
9
What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?翻修手术治疗慢性髋关节置换术后脱位的存活率如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):374-379. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000392.
10
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的临床和影像学结果:至少十年随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach.采用前外侧入路的金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的中期临床和影像学结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Dec;107(4):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00789-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Repeated metal ion measurements and long-term outcome of Durom/MMC total hip arthroplasty.重复的金属离子测量与 Durom/MMC 全髋关节置换术的长期结果。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jan 19;93:241-248. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.1444.
3
Comparison of the long-term cause of failure and survivorship of four hundred and twenty seven metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: resurfacing versus large head total hip arthroplasty.427例金属对金属髋关节置换术失败的长期原因及生存率比较:表面置换与大头全髋关节置换术对比
Int Orthop. 2021 Dec;45(12):3075-3081. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05044-y. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Medical Devices by a Timely Analysis of Adverse Events.通过及时分析不良事件提高使用医疗设备患者的生活质量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 26;6:56. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00056. eCollection 2019.
5
Explant analysis of the Biomet Magnum/ReCap metal-on-metal hip joint.Biomet Magnum/ReCap金属对金属髋关节的取出物分析
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Feb;6(2):113-122. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0130.R2.
6
Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.现代中、大直径金属对金属髋关节置换术中金属碎屑不良反应导致的失败发生率——新型筛查方法的影响:系统评价与Meta回归分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0147872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147872. eCollection 2016.
7
Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.2016年髋关节表面置换术的当前适应症。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Mar;9(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9324-0.
8
Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.髋关节表面置换术:文献的系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2012 Dec;36(12):2399-410. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1686-3. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
9
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术:安全性与翻修率分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2012;12(19):1-63. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
What are the risks accompanying the reduced wear benefit of low-clearance hip resurfacing?髋关节表面置换术低间隙带来的低磨损优势伴随哪些风险?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2800-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2476-3. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
[Durom™ hip resurfacing. Short- to midterm clinical and radiological outcome].[杜罗姆™髋关节表面置换术。短期至中期临床及影像学结果]
Orthopade. 2010 Sep;39(9):842-52. doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1656-7.
2
The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.髋关节表面置换术中假体大小对手术结果的影响:文献综述
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):469-76. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22967.
3
Femoral neck resorption following hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a radiological and biomechanical analysis.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术后股骨颈吸收:影像学和生物力学分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Dec;130(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1070-y. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
4
Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision.初次表面髋关节置换术的结果:早期翻修的风险因素评估。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):66-71. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685434.
5
Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component in patients younger than 50 years.50 岁以下患者的非骨水泥锥形股骨组件全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan;26(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
6
[Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].[采用外侧入路的DUROM髋关节表面置换系统的手术原则及临床经验]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;21(6):586-601. doi: 10.1007/s00064-009-2007-x.
7
Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?来自国家关节登记处的髋关节表面置换数据:它们告诉了我们什么?它们没有告诉我们什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):351-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3.
8
Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties.金属对金属表面置换髋关节成形术中的坏死和炎症变化。
Acta Orthop. 2009 Dec;80(6):653-9. doi: 10.3109/17453670903473016.
9
Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.髋关节表面置换术后炎性假瘤形成的危险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Dec;91(12):1566-74. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22287.
10
Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.Durom Metasul 髋臼组件失效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):400-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1071-8. Epub 2009 Sep 2.