Suppr超能文献

初次表面髋关节置换术的结果:早期翻修的风险因素评估。

Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision.

机构信息

Perth Orthopaedic Institute, Fremantle Hospital and University of Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):66-71. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685434.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The outcome of modern resurfacing remains to be determined. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) started collection of data on hip resurfacing at a time when modern resurfacing was started in Australia. The rate of resurfacing has been higher in Australia than in many other countries. As a result, the AOANJRR has one of the largest series of resurfacing procedures. This study was undertaken to determine the results of this series and the risk factors associated with revision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the AOANJRR were used to analyze the survivorship of 12,093 primary resurfacing hip replacements reported to the Joint Replacement Registry between September 1999 and December 2008. This was compared to the results of primary conventional total hip replacement reported during the same period. The Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards models were used to determine risk factors such as age, sex, femoral component size, primary diagnosis, and implant design.

RESULTS

Female patients had a higher revision rate than males; however, after adjusting for head size, the revision rates were similar. Prostheses with head sizes of less than 50 mm had a higher revision rate than those with head sizes of 50 mm or more. At 8 years, the cumulative per cent revision of hip resurfacing was 5.3 (4.6-6.2), as compared to 4.0 (3.8-4.2) for total hip replacement. However, in osteoarthritis patients aged less than 55 years with head sizes of 50 mm or more, the 7-year cumulative per cent revision for hip resurfacing was 3.0 (2.2-4.2). Also, hips with dysplasia and some implant designs had an increased risk of revision.

INTERPRETATION

Risk factors for revision of resurfacing were older patients, smaller femoral head size, patients with developmental dysplasia, and certain implant designs. These results highlight the importance of patient and prosthesis selection in optimizing the outcome of hip resurfacing.

摘要

背景与目的

现代表面置换术的疗效仍有待确定。澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)在澳大利亚开始应用现代表面置换术时开始收集髋关节表面置换的数据。澳大利亚的表面置换术使用率高于许多其他国家。因此,AOANJRR 拥有最大系列的表面置换术之一。本研究旨在确定该系列的结果和与翻修相关的危险因素。

患者与方法

使用 AOANJRR 的数据,对 1999 年 9 月至 2008 年 12 月期间向关节置换登记处报告的 12093 例初次髋关节表面置换术的生存率进行了分析。将其与同期报告的初次常规全髋关节置换术的结果进行了比较。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法和比例风险模型来确定年龄、性别、股骨部件大小、主要诊断和植入物设计等危险因素。

结果

女性患者的翻修率高于男性;然而,在调整头大小后,翻修率相似。头大小小于 50mm 的假体翻修率高于头大小为 50mm 或更大的假体。8 年时,髋关节表面置换术的累计翻修率为 5.3%(4.6%-6.2%),而全髋关节置换术为 4.0%(3.8%-4.2%)。然而,在年龄小于 55 岁且头大小为 50mm 或更大的骨关节炎患者中,髋关节表面置换术的 7 年累计翻修率为 3.0%(2.2%-4.2%)。此外,髋关节发育不良和某些植入物设计的髋关节有更高的翻修风险。

解释

表面置换术翻修的危险因素包括年龄较大、股骨头较小、发育性髋关节发育不良的患者和某些植入物设计。这些结果强调了患者和假体选择在优化髋关节表面置换术结果方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/2856206/c0054ca7a659/ORT-1745-3674-81-066-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验