Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Universitat Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Liver Transpl. 2011 Feb;17(2):167-77. doi: 10.1002/lt.22211.
Tacrolimus, a cornerstone immunosuppressant, is available as a twice-daily formulation (tacrolimus bid). A once-daily prolonged-release formulation (tacrolimus qd) has been developed. This 6-week, randomized, phase 2, multicenter, open-label, prospective trial in primary liver transplant recipients investigated and compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus for qd and bid formulations. All patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (tacrolimus qd, n = 67; bid, n = 62). PK data were available for 77 patients (tacrolimus qd, n = 45; bid, n = 32). Tacrolimus area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24) ) at equivalent doses was approximately 50% lower for tacrolimus qd than for bid on day 1 (146 versus 264 ng · h/mL, respectively), but by day 14 was comparable between treatments (324 and 287 ng · h/mL, respectively) with higher tacrolimus qd doses. There was a strong correlation between AUC(0-24) and concentration at 24 hours for tacrolimus qd and bid (r = 0.92 and r = 0.76, respectively). Furthermore, the relationship between these 2 parameters (ie, the slope of the line) was also similar for the 2 formulations. Efficacy endpoints were comparable for both formulations at 6 weeks with no marked differences in incidence, nature, or severity of adverse events between treatments (although the study was not powered to draw efficacy conclusions). These results suggest that targeting the same trough levels will achieve similar total AUC over 24 hours for both tacrolimus qd and tacrolimus bid in de novo liver transplant recipients.
他克莫司是一种基础免疫抑制剂,有每日两次的制剂(他克莫司bid)和每日一次的缓释制剂(他克莫司qd)。本项为期 6 周、随机、2 期、多中心、开放标签、前瞻性研究纳入了初治肝移植受者,旨在评估和比较qd 和 bid 两种制剂的他克莫司药代动力学(PK)。所有患者均接受基于他克莫司的免疫抑制治疗(他克莫司 qd,n = 67;bid,n = 62)。共有 77 例患者(他克莫司 qd,n = 45;bid,n = 32)的 PK 数据可用。qd 组在等效剂量下,第 1 天的他克莫司 0 至 24 小时(AUC 0-24)曲线下面积(AUC 0-24)约为 bid 组的 50%(分别为 146 和 264 ng·h/mL),但至第 14 天,两种治疗方法的 AUC 0-24 无差异(分别为 324 和 287 ng·h/mL),且 qd 组的他克莫司剂量更高。qd 和 bid 组的 AUC 0-24 与 24 小时浓度之间具有强相关性(r = 0.92 和 r = 0.76)。此外,这两种制剂这两个参数(即直线斜率)之间的关系也相似。6 周时,两种制剂的疗效终点相似,两种治疗方法的不良事件发生率、性质或严重程度均无显著差异(尽管该研究无足够效力得出疗效结论)。这些结果提示,在初治肝移植受者中,qd 和 bid 两种制剂的目标谷浓度相同,24 小时的总 AUC 也相似。