• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊环境下局部麻醉下的NovaSure子宫内膜切除术:一项观察性研究。

NovaSure endometrial ablation under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting: An observational study.

作者信息

Kalkat R K, Cartmill R S V

机构信息

Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(2):152-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.538772.

DOI:10.3109/01443615.2010.538772
PMID:21281033
Abstract

The use of NovaSure under local anaesthesia (LA) has been described as part of efficacy trials, but its use in an outpatient setting has not previously been explored. This prospective study was conducted to determine feasibility and efficacy of NovaSure in the outpatient setting under LA. The study included all women with menorrhagia unresponsive to medical management and were agreeable for treatment under LA (n = 50). The mean duration of procedure was 100 s. A total of 47 (94%) patients were discharged home the same day. Simple analgesics controlled postoperative pain in 44 (88%) patients. Seven (14%) patients gave preference for general anaesthesia for future treatment. The mean pain scores at 30, 60 and 90 min were 4.18, 4.38 and 3.85, respectively on the visual analogue scale. At follow-up, the improvement in menstrual symptoms was seen in 47 (94%) and the satisfaction rate was 43 (86%) and 47 (94%) at 4 and 6 months, respectively.

摘要

在局部麻醉(LA)下使用NovaSure已被描述为疗效试验的一部分,但此前尚未探讨其在门诊环境中的使用情况。本前瞻性研究旨在确定NovaSure在局部麻醉下门诊环境中的可行性和疗效。该研究纳入了所有对药物治疗无效且同意在局部麻醉下接受治疗的月经过多女性(n = 50)。手术平均持续时间为100秒。共有47名(94%)患者在同一天出院回家。简单镇痛药控制了44名(88%)患者的术后疼痛。7名(14%)患者更倾向于在未来治疗时选择全身麻醉。在视觉模拟量表上,30、60和90分钟时的平均疼痛评分分别为4.18、4.38和3.85。随访时,47名(94%)患者的月经症状有所改善,4个月和6个月时的满意率分别为43名(86%)和47名(94%)。

相似文献

1
NovaSure endometrial ablation under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting: An observational study.门诊环境下局部麻醉下的NovaSure子宫内膜切除术:一项观察性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(2):152-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.538772.
2
Endometrial ablation with paracervical block.宫颈旁阻滞下的子宫内膜消融术。
J Reprod Med. 2009 Oct;54(10):617-20.
3
Office endometrial ablation with local anesthesia using the HydroThermAblator system: Comparison of outcomes in patients with submucous myomas with those with normal cavities in 246 cases performed over 5(1/2) years.在 5 年半的时间里,对 246 例患者进行了局部麻醉下的 HydroThermAblator 系统宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术:比较黏膜下肌瘤患者与正常宫腔患者的结局。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):700-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.023.
4
Prospective observational study of Thermablate Endometrial Ablation System as an outpatient procedure.热消融子宫内膜切除系统作为门诊手术的前瞻性观察研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):476-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.005.
5
Outpatient thermal balloon ablation of the endometrium.门诊子宫内膜热球囊消融术。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Nov;82(5):1395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.042.
6
Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using the Hydro ThermAblator in an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic: feasibility and acceptability.在门诊宫腔镜诊所使用水热消融器进行宫腔镜子宫内膜消融术:可行性与可接受性
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.01.008.
7
Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient setting, without local anesthesia or intravenous sedation: a prospective cohort study.门诊环境下无需局部麻醉或静脉镇静的Thermachoice子宫内膜消融术:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.030.
8
Randomized controlled trial comparing Thermachoice III* in the outpatient versus daycase setting.在门诊与日间手术环境中比较Thermachoice III*的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):642-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1502. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
9
[Outpatient treatment of menorrhagia].[月经过多的门诊治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 May 10;172(19):1443-6.
10
A randomised trial comparing local versus general anaesthesia for microwave endometrial ablation.一项比较微波子宫内膜切除术局部麻醉与全身麻醉的随机试验。
BJOG. 2003 Sep;110(9):799-807.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective study on the outcomes and satisfaction with endometrial ablation by bipolar energy (NovaSure) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.双极能量(NovaSure)子宫内膜切除术治疗月经过多的疗效及满意度回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):385-393. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07726-5. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Management of abnormal uterine bleeding - focus on ambulatory hysteroscopy.异常子宫出血的管理——聚焦于门诊宫腔镜检查
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Mar 22;10:127-136. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98579. eCollection 2018.
3
Late-onset endometrial ablation failure.
迟发性子宫内膜消融失败。
Case Rep Womens Health. 2017 Jul 12;15:11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2017.07.001. eCollection 2017 Jul.
4
Cost effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the NovaSure(®) system versus other global ablation modalities and hysterectomy for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding: US commercial and Medicaid payer perspectives.NovaSure(®)系统子宫内膜切除术与其他全球消融方式及子宫切除术治疗异常子宫出血的成本效益:美国商业保险和医疗补助支付方视角
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Jan 6;7:59-73. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S75030. eCollection 2015.
5
Ten-year literature review of global endometrial ablation with the NovaSure® device.使用NovaSure®设备进行全球子宫内膜切除术的十年文献综述。
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Mar 11;6:269-80. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S56364. eCollection 2014.