Suppr超能文献

初级保健中单纯性外阴阴道念珠菌病的患者偏好和治疗安全性。

Patient preferences and treatment safety for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis in primary health care.

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación, Atención Primaria Area 9, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 31;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-63.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaginitis is a common complaint in primary care. In uncomplicated candidal vaginitis, there are no differences in effectiveness between oral or vaginal treatment. Some studies describe that the preferred treatment is the oral one, but a Cochrane's review points out inconsistencies associated with the report of the preferred way that limit the use of such data. Risk factors associated with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis still remain controversial.

METHODS/DESIGN: This work describes a protocol of a multicentric prospective observational study with one year follow up, to describe the women's reasons and preferences to choose the way of administration (oral vs topical) in the treatment of not complicated candidal vaginitis. The number of women required is 765, they are chosen by consecutive sampling. All of whom are aged 16 and over with vaginal discharge and/or vaginal pruritus, diagnosed with not complicated vulvovaginitis in Primary Care in Madrid.The main outcome variable is the preferences of the patients in treatment choice; secondary outcome variables are time to symptoms relief and adverse reactions and the frequency of recurrent vulvovaginitis and the risk factors. In the statistical analysis, for the main objective will be descriptive for each of the variables, bivariant analysis and multivariate analysis (logistic regression).. The dependent variable being the type of treatment chosen (oral or topical) and the independent, the variables that after bivariant analysis, have been associated to the treatment preference.

DISCUSSION

Clinical decisions, recommendations, and practice guidelines must not only attend to the best available evidence, but also to the values and preferences of the informed patient.

摘要

背景

阴道炎是初级保健中的常见主诉。在单纯性念珠菌性阴道炎中,口服和阴道治疗的效果没有差异。一些研究表明,首选治疗方法是口服治疗,但 Cochrane 的一项综述指出,与报告首选方法相关的不一致性限制了此类数据的使用。与复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病相关的危险因素仍存在争议。

方法/设计:本研究描述了一项为期一年的多中心前瞻性观察研究方案,旨在描述女性在治疗非复杂性单纯性念珠菌性阴道炎时选择给药途径(口服与局部)的原因和偏好。需要的女性人数为 765 人,采用连续抽样选择。所有年龄在 16 岁及以上、有阴道分泌物和/或阴道瘙痒、在马德里初级保健中诊断为非复杂性外阴阴道炎的患者均符合入选标准。主要结局变量是患者治疗选择的偏好;次要结局变量是症状缓解和不良反应的时间、复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病的频率以及危险因素。在统计分析中,主要目的是对每个变量进行描述性分析,进行双变量分析和多变量分析(逻辑回归)。因变量为选择的治疗类型(口服或局部),自变量为双变量分析后与治疗偏好相关的变量。

讨论

临床决策、建议和实践指南不仅要考虑到最佳现有证据,还要考虑到知情患者的价值观和偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验