• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[口腔鳞状细胞癌中DNA倍体的流式细胞术分析]

[Flow cytometric analysis of DNA-ploidy in oral squamous cell carcinomas].

作者信息

Wang X L

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical College, Shijiazhuang.

出版信息

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1990 Jul;25(4):210-2, 251-2.

PMID:2128233
Abstract

In an attempt to evaluate the significance of cellular DNA content as an objective prognostic indicator of oral squamous cell carcinomas, a retrospective analysis of 70 paraffin-embedded specimens using flow cytometry was performed. 41 patients (58.6%) had heteroploid tumors and 29 patients (41.4%) had diploid or nearly diploid DNA distribution pattern. There was significant difference in 5-year disease-free rate between patients with heteroploid and diploid or nearly diploid tumors, and the relationship between heteroploid and cervical metastasis approached statistical significance (0.10 greater than P greater than 0.05). The DNA content had no correlation with histologic grade, clinical stage and tumor size. It is concluded that patients with heteroploidy primary tumors have a significantly poorer prognosis than those with diploid or nearly diploid tumors and have higher risk for regional metastasis.

摘要

为评估细胞DNA含量作为口腔鳞状细胞癌客观预后指标的意义,采用流式细胞术对70例石蜡包埋标本进行回顾性分析。41例患者(58.6%)肿瘤为异倍体,29例患者(41.4%)DNA分布模式为二倍体或近二倍体。异倍体肿瘤患者与二倍体或近二倍体肿瘤患者的5年无病生存率存在显著差异,异倍体与颈部转移之间的关系接近统计学意义(0.10>P>0.05)。DNA含量与组织学分级、临床分期及肿瘤大小无关。结论是,原发性肿瘤为异倍体的患者预后明显比原发性肿瘤为二倍体或近二倍体的患者差,且区域转移风险更高。

相似文献

1
[Flow cytometric analysis of DNA-ploidy in oral squamous cell carcinomas].[口腔鳞状细胞癌中DNA倍体的流式细胞术分析]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1990 Jul;25(4):210-2, 251-2.
2
Flow cytometric DNA-ploidy as a prognostic indicator in oral squamous cell carcinoma.流式细胞术DNA倍体作为口腔鳞状细胞癌的预后指标
Chin Med J (Engl). 1990 Jul;103(7):572-5.
3
Flow cytometric analysis of primary and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.口腔和口咽原发性及转移性鳞状细胞癌的流式细胞术分析
Laryngoscope. 1995 Feb;105(2):149-55. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199502000-00007.
4
Tumor DNA content as a prognostic indicator in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and tongue base.肿瘤DNA含量作为口腔和舌根鳞状细胞癌的预后指标。
Head Neck. 1998 May;20(3):232-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199805)20:3<232::aid-hed8>3.0.co;2-1.
5
Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in oral squamous cell carcinomas. A retrospective flow and image cytometric study with comparison of DNA ploidy in excisional biopsy specimens and resection specimens, primary, tumors, and lymph node metastases.口腔鳞状细胞癌中DNA倍性的预后意义。一项回顾性流式细胞术和图像细胞术研究,比较切除活检标本与切除标本、原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移灶中的DNA倍性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jan;79(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80077-0.
6
DNA aneuploidy by flow cytometry is an independent prognostic factor in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.通过流式细胞术检测的DNA非整倍性是口腔鳞状细胞癌的一个独立预后因素。
Anticancer Res. 1999 Mar-Apr;19(2B):1419-22.
7
[Flow cytometric analysis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral and maxillofacial region].[口腔颌面部鳞状细胞癌的流式细胞术分析]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992 Jul;27(4):222-4, 256.
8
DNA ploidy, proliferation index, grade, and stage as prognostic factors for vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.DNA倍体、增殖指数、分级和分期作为外阴鳞状细胞癌的预后因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Feb;48(2):232-5. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1039.
9
[Correlation of DNA ploidy in fresh tumor tissues to prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].新鲜肿瘤组织中DNA倍体与鼻咽癌预后的相关性
Ai Zheng. 2007 Sep;26(9):1015-9.
10
[Retrospective flow-cytometric analysis of the DNA content in colorectal carcinomas and the test of the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy].[结直肠癌DNA含量的回顾性流式细胞术分析及DNA倍体预后意义的检测]
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1990;74:233-7.