Suppr超能文献

[标准持续输注与循环输注在肠外营养中的效果比较]

[Comparison of the effects of standard continuous infusion and cyclic infusion in parenteral nutrition].

作者信息

Gu S N

机构信息

Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing command, PLA.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1990 Dec;28(12):748-52, 783.

PMID:2128266
Abstract

This paper reported the results of prospective study on the effects of standard continuous total parenteral nutrition (S-TPN) and cyclic total parenteral nutrition (C-TPN) in 20 hospitalized patients with moderate catabolism. The study course continued for 20 days. The results were evaluated by 48 indexes, and all data were processed statistically. The study results showed that the effects of S-TPN and C-TPN on metabolism of glucose, protein and fat, immune functions, functions of vital organs, and body weight were about the same. The authors came to the conclusion that S-TPN is a good way of nutritional support for hospitalized patients, while C-TPN has its advantage for home use.

摘要

本文报道了对20例中度分解代谢的住院患者进行标准持续全胃肠外营养(S-TPN)和循环全胃肠外营养(C-TPN)效果的前瞻性研究结果。研究过程持续了20天。通过48项指标对结果进行评估,并对所有数据进行统计学处理。研究结果表明,S-TPN和C-TPN对葡萄糖、蛋白质和脂肪代谢、免疫功能、重要器官功能及体重的影响大致相同。作者得出结论,S-TPN是住院患者营养支持的一种好方法,而C-TPN在家庭使用方面具有优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验