• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂:是否联合机器人辅助。

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Feb;17(1):54-60.

PMID:21282827
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess perioperative and medium-term outcome after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistance for vaginal vault prolapse in a Hong Kong tertiary centre.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

An urogynaecology unit in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

All women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistance for vaginal vault prolapse from March 2005 to May 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The perioperative and medium-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 36 women underwent the operation during the study period. The mean operating time was 205 minutes, mean blood loss was 144 mL. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Two women required early re-operation but recovered fully. In all, 35 women were followed up for 29 (standard deviation, 19) months. Three of them (9%) had a recurrence of stage II prolapse, but there was statistically significant improvement in the pelvic organ prolapse quantification assessment for all three compartments of the vagina, and the length of vagina was well preserved. There were no mesh exposure or erosions. The overall objective cure rate of 91% (32/35) was high, and 91% (32/35) were satisfied with the operative outcome. Stress incontinence and voiding difficulty were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse is safe, although complications arising from concomitant surgery should not be neglected. High rates of objective cures and patient satisfaction were achieved. There were no mesh exposure or erosions. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy should be considered an option for women with vaginal vault prolapse.

摘要

目的

评估香港一家三级中心行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(加或不加机器人辅助)治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的围手术期和中期结果。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

香港的一个泌尿科妇科单位。

患者

2005 年 3 月至 2010 年 5 月期间因阴道穹窿脱垂而行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(加或不加机器人辅助)的所有女性。

主要观察指标

围手术期和中期结果。

结果

研究期间共有 36 名女性接受了手术。平均手术时间为 205 分钟,平均失血量为 144 毫升。中位住院时间为 4 天。有 2 名女性需要早期再次手术,但均完全康复。共有 35 名女性接受了 29 个月(标准差为 19 个月)的随访。其中 3 名(9%)复发 II 度脱垂,但阴道三个部位的盆腔器官脱垂定量评估均有统计学显著改善,阴道长度得到很好的保留。无网片外露或侵蚀。91%(32/35)的整体客观治愈率高,91%(32/35)的患者对手术结果满意。压力性尿失禁和排尿困难明显减轻。

结论

腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂是安全的,尽管应注意避免因合并手术而导致的并发症。客观治愈率和患者满意度均较高,无网片外露或侵蚀。腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术应被视为阴道穹窿脱垂患者的一种选择。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂:是否联合机器人辅助。
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Feb;17(1):54-60.
2
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂:8 年经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
3
Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的网片相关并发症
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1475-1481. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.机器人骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:中期手术及生活质量结局综述
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000047.
5
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与阴道骶棘肌固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的随机对照试验:SALTO - 2试验,研究方案
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Jul 26;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0402-2.
6
Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.腹腔镜侧方悬吊网片修补阴道穹窿脱垂。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;287(2):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2574-1. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
7
Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗重度阴道穹窿脱垂的长期疗效
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040.
8
Tension-free vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in Chinese women.经阴道无张力网片治疗中国女性盆腔器官脱垂。
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Dec;19(6):511-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj133948. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.香港华裔患者盆腔器官脱垂行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术伴或不伴同期子宫切除术的临床结局及并发症:中位随访7年的结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05403-2. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.无张力阴道网片手术与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:使用日本全国住院患者数据库对围手术期结果的分析
Int J Urol. 2018 Jul;25(7):655-659. doi: 10.1111/iju.13587. Epub 2018 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety of Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jul;36(7):1355-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06158-2. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.机器人骶骨阴道固定术的治疗效果。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):509-517. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23073. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy.
骶棘韧带固定术中阴道前壁体内折叠的新“皱纹法”
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 22;10(9):1822. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091822.
4
Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):449. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4347.
5
Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.比较机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04741-x. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.腹部机器人重建盆底手术后的长期网片侵蚀率:一项前瞻性研究及文献综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jul;31(7):1423-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术:在大型女性盆底医学与腹腔镜手术实践中的手术时间及效率
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jun;28(6):887-892. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3179-1. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道顶端脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Mar;27(3):355-66. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2763-0. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):252-60. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000070.
10
Apical prolapse.心尖脱垂
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1815-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2172-1.