Harold F M
Department of Biochemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
Microbiol Rev. 1990 Dec;54(4):381-431. doi: 10.1128/mr.54.4.381-431.1990.
We recognize organisms first and foremost by their forms, but how they grow and shape themselves still largely passes understanding. The objective of this article is to survey what has been learned of morphogenesis of walled eucaryotic microorganisms as a set of problems in cellular heredity, biochemistry, physiology, and organization. Despite the diversity of microbial forms and habits, some common principles can be discerned. (i) That the form of each organism represents the expression of a genetic program is almost universally taken for granted. However, reflection on the findings with morphologically aberrant mutants suggests that the metaphor of a genetic program is misleading. Cellular form is generated by a web of interacting chemical and physical processes, whose every strand is woven of multiple gene products. The relationship between genes and form is indirect and cumulative; therefore, morphogenesis must be addressed as a problem not of molecular genetics but of cellular physiology. (ii) The shape of walled cells is determined by the manner in which the wall is laid down during growth and development. Turgor pressure commonly, perhaps always, supplies the driving force for surface enlargement. Cells yield to this scalar force by localized, controlled wall synthesis; their forms represent variations on the theme of local compliance with global force. (iii) Growth and division in bacteria display most immediately the interplay of hydrostatic pressure, localized wall synthesis, and structural constraints. Koch's surface stress theory provides a comprehensive and quantitative framework for understanding bacterial shapes. (iv) In the larger and more versatile eucaryotic cells, expansion is mediated by the secretion of vesicles. Secretion and ancillary processes, such as cytoplasmic transport, are spatially organized on the micrometer scale. The diversity of vectorial physiology and of the forms it generates is illustrated by examples: apical growth of fungal hyphae, bud formation in yeasts, germination of fucoid zygotes, and development of cells of Nitella, Closterium, and other unicellular algae. (v) Unicellular organisms, no less than embryos, have a remarkable capacity to impose spatial order upon themselves with or without the help of directional cues. Self-organization is reviewed here from two perspectives: the theoretical exploration of morphogens, gradients, and fields, and experimental study of polarization in Fucus cells, extension of hyphal tips, and pattern formation in ciliates. Here is the heart of the matter, yet self-organization remains nearly as mysterious as it was a century ago, a subject in search of a paradigm.
我们首先通过生物体的形态来识别它们,但它们如何生长以及塑造自身在很大程度上仍难以理解。本文的目的是综述关于有壁真核微生物形态发生的相关知识,将其作为细胞遗传学、生物化学、生理学和组织学中的一系列问题。尽管微生物的形态和习性多种多样,但仍可 discerned 一些共同原则。(i)几乎普遍认为每种生物体的形态代表了一个遗传程序的表达。然而,对形态异常突变体研究结果的思考表明,遗传程序这个比喻具有误导性。细胞形态是由相互作用的化学和物理过程网络产生的,其每一条线索都是由多种基因产物交织而成。基因与形态之间的关系是间接且累积的;因此,形态发生必须作为一个细胞生理学问题而非分子遗传学问题来处理。(ii)有壁细胞的形状取决于其在生长和发育过程中细胞壁形成的方式。膨压通常(也许总是)为表面扩张提供驱动力。细胞通过局部的、受控的细胞壁合成来应对这种标量力;它们的形态代表了局部顺应全局力这一主题的变体。(iii)细菌的生长和分裂最直接地展示了静水压力、局部细胞壁合成和结构限制之间的相互作用。科赫的表面应力理论为理解细菌形状提供了一个全面且定量的框架。(iv)在更大且更具多样性的真核细胞中,扩张是由囊泡分泌介导的。分泌及辅助过程,如细胞质运输,在微米尺度上进行空间组织。矢量生理学及其产生的形态的多样性通过以下例子得以说明:真菌菌丝的顶端生长、酵母中的芽形成、岩藻合子的萌发以及伞藻、新月藻和其他单细胞藻类细胞的发育。(v)单细胞生物体与胚胎一样,无论有无定向线索的帮助,都具有显著的自我施加空间秩序的能力。本文从两个角度综述了自组织:对形态发生素、梯度和场的理论探索,以及对墨角藻细胞极化、菌丝尖端延伸和纤毛虫中模式形成的实验研究。这就是问题的核心所在,然而自组织仍然几乎和一个世纪前一样神秘,是一个在寻找范式的主题。