Leelahanaj Thawatchai
Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93 Suppl 6:S43-50.
Aripiprazole is the first atypical antipsychotic approved for adjunctive treatment to antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The current study aims to present an economic model and cost-effectiveness estimates for aripiprazole compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy to antidepressant treatment in patients with MDD who showed an incomplete response to a prospective 8-week trial of antidepressant therapy.
An economic model of MDD treatment was developed to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes in Thai patients. Efficacy data were derived from a pooled analysis of two studies. A cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed in simulate the impact of treatment outcomes and costs over a 6-week time horizon. The primary outcome of the model was remission of symptoms. Quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) was the secondary outcome. The event probabilities were used to derive the transitional probability used in the model and to calculate the weighted cost of each treatment outcome. Only direct costs were considered. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to test the sensitivity of the model outputs.
Treatment with aripiprazole came at the total costs per remission of 30,970 Baht while treatment with placebo came at the total costs per remission of 28,409 Baht. Placebo had lower total costs per QALY than aripiprazole (35,511 Baht vs. 38,713 Baht). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of augmentation with aripiprazole compared with placebo was 2,561 Baht per remission gained and 3,201 Baht per QALY gained. Aripiprazole dominated placebo if the value of transitional probability of remission changed to a value of greater than 0.348 from the base-case value of 0.257. Aripiprazole was more cost-effective than placebo as adjunctive therapy if the unit cost of aripiprazole is more than 48.9% discount.
Adjunctive aripiprazole is not more cost-effective than adjunctive placebo in Thai patients with MDD who showed an inadequate response to at least one prospective antidepressant therapy. Remission rates and unit cost are the key parameters involving the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole.
阿立哌唑是首个被批准用于辅助治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者抗抑郁治疗的非典型抗精神病药物。本研究旨在建立一个经济模型,并对阿立哌唑与安慰剂作为辅助治疗药物在对为期8周的抗抑郁治疗前瞻性试验反应不完全的MDD患者中的成本效益进行评估。
建立了一个MDD治疗的经济模型,以估计泰国患者的临床和经济结果。疗效数据来自两项研究的汇总分析。构建了一个成本效益分析模型,以模拟6周时间范围内治疗结果和成本的影响。该模型的主要结果是症状缓解。质量调整生命年(QALY)是次要结果。事件概率用于推导模型中使用的转移概率,并计算每个治疗结果的加权成本。仅考虑直接成本。进行了单向敏感性分析以测试模型输出的敏感性。
使用阿立哌唑治疗时,每次缓解的总成本为30,970泰铢,而使用安慰剂治疗时,每次缓解的总成本为28,409泰铢。安慰剂每获得一个QALY的总成本低于阿立哌唑(35,511泰铢对38,713泰铢)。与安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑增效治疗的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一次缓解增加2,561泰铢,每获得一个QALY增加3,201泰铢。如果缓解的转移概率值从基础值0.257变为大于0.348,则阿立哌唑优于安慰剂。如果阿立哌唑的单位成本有超过48.9%的折扣,则阿立哌唑作为辅助治疗比安慰剂更具成本效益。
在对至少一种前瞻性抗抑郁治疗反应不足的泰国MDD患者中,辅助使用阿立哌唑并不比辅助使用安慰剂更具成本效益。缓解率和单位成本是涉及阿立哌唑成本效益的关键参数。