Dabrowska Magdalena M, Mikula Tomasz, Stanczak Wojciech, Malyszko Jolanta, Wiercinska-Drapalo Alicja
Department of Hepatology and Acquired Immunodeficiences, Warsaw Medical University, Poland.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011 Aug;27(8):809-13. doi: 10.1089/AID.2010.0233. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
Recently, a new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was presented as a better alternative to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula for GFR estimation (eGFR) in patients with relatively well-preserved kidney function. The main objective of our study was to compare the eGFR results arrived by the new CKD-EPI to the older MDRD equation in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive and ARV-treated HIV-1-infected patients. The study was performed in 287 adult HIV-1-infected patients and was an evaluation comparing eGFR results based on age, gender, race, and serum creatinine. The biggest difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measured by the two formulas was seen in ARV-naive men with well-preserved kidney function (p = 0.001). Moreover, we found a significant negative correlation between mean difference in eGFR measured by the two equations and the age of the studied subjects (r = -0.37, p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between mean difference in eGFR and HIV viral load (r = -0.15, p = 0.2). Independent of the equation used, a significant decrease of eGFR in ARV-treated in comparison to ARV-untreated HIV-1-infected patients was seen (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in HIV-1-infected subjects, especially in ARV-naive men with well-preserved kidney function, eGFR measured by MDRD and CKD-EPI formulas varies strongly following the method used. Such discrepancies may be important in everyday clinical practice and must be confirmed by additional studies using GFR measured with a reference method.
最近,一种新的慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)公式被提出,对于肾功能相对良好的患者,它是估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)时比肾病饮食改良(MDRD)公式更好的选择。我们研究的主要目的是比较新的CKD-EPI公式与旧的MDRD公式在未接受抗逆转录病毒(ARV)治疗和接受ARV治疗的HIV-1感染患者中得出的eGFR结果。该研究在287名成年HIV-1感染患者中进行,是一项基于年龄、性别、种族和血清肌酐比较eGFR结果的评估。在肾功能良好的未接受ARV治疗的男性中,两种公式测得的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)差异最大(p = 0.001)。此外,我们发现两种公式测得的eGFR平均差异与研究对象的年龄之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.37,p < 0.001)。未观察到eGFR平均差异与HIV病毒载量之间的相关性(r = -0.15,p = 0.2)。与未接受ARV治疗的HIV-1感染患者相比,接受ARV治疗的患者eGFR显著降低(p < 0.001),与所使用的公式无关。总之,在HIV-1感染患者中,尤其是肾功能良好的未接受ARV治疗的男性中,MDRD和CKD-EPI公式测得的eGFR因所用方法不同而有很大差异。这种差异在日常临床实践中可能很重要,必须通过使用参考方法测量GFR的额外研究加以证实。