Malin Nigel A, Race David G
University of Sunderland, UK.
J Intellect Disabil. 2010 Dec;14(4):315-28. doi: 10.1177/1744629510395072.
This is the first of two articles examining links between policy developments and changes in professional practice within learning disability services in England, focusing upon emergent differences between children's and adult provision. The article focuses on the evolving tension around policy directions and managerialism/professionalism, with the latter as a set of practices driving services, particularly following the 1988 Griffiths Report but referring also to its antecedents. Implications of this development are examined to highlight a difference in emphasis between the credibility and professional status of the workforce in children's, as opposed to adult, services for people with learning disabilities. A historical narrative demonstrates a continuum from the policies of Thatcherism to those of New Labour, underpinned by the assertion that normalization ideas have shaped both social policy and professional directions. The origins of current policy initiatives covering the last 20 years are explored, showing the consequences of a developing gap between professional inputs for children's and adult services.
这是两篇探讨英格兰学习障碍服务领域政策发展与专业实践变化之间联系的文章中的第一篇,重点关注儿童服务与成人服务之间新出现的差异。本文聚焦于围绕政策方向与管理主义/专业主义之间不断演变的紧张关系,后者作为推动服务的一系列实践,特别是在1988年《格里菲斯报告》之后,但也提及了其前身。对这一发展的影响进行了审视,以突出学习障碍儿童服务与成人服务中工作人员的可信度和专业地位在侧重点上的差异。一篇历史叙述展示了从撒切尔主义政策到新工党政策的连续性,其依据是正常化理念塑造了社会政策和专业方向这一论断。探讨了过去20年当前政策举措的起源,揭示了儿童服务与成人服务的专业投入之间不断扩大的差距所带来的后果。