• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测英格兰果断外展的结果。

Predicting outcome of assertive outreach across England.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):313-22. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0338-4. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-010-0338-4
PMID:21286684
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assertive community treatment for the severely mentally ill is being implemented increasingly internationally. It is unclear whether recommended characteristics of assertive outreach (AO) teams influence care and outcomes. We hypothesised that recommended characteristics of AO teams such as joint health and social care management would predict reduced hospitalisation in the first year of an AO client programme and related outcomes throughout England.

METHODS

A two-stage design was used: a stratified sample of 100 of the 186 'stand-alone' AO teams in England and a systematic sample of clients from each team with stratification for black and ethnic minority patients. Team characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected from teams. Analyses took account of patients' histories, clustering and ethnic minority over-sampling.

RESULTS

Under AO the proportion of time spent in hospital following admission decreased. Only 3/1,096 patients went missing in 9 months. Although patient' histories significantly predicted outcomes almost no team characteristics predicted re-admission or other patient outcomes after 1 and 3 years. Ethnic minority clients were more likely to be on compulsory orders only on jointly managed teams (P = 0.030). Multidisciplinary teams and teams not working out of hours significantly predicted that patients received psychological interventions, but only 17% of sampled patients received such treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of AO teams do not explain long-term patient outcomes. Since recommended team characteristics are not effective new models of care should be developed and the process of care tested. Managing teams to implement evidence-based psychological interventions might improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

积极社区治疗(assertive community treatment,ACT)正在越来越多地在国际上被用于严重精神疾病患者。目前尚不清楚 ACT 外展团队(AO)的推荐特征是否会影响护理和结果。我们假设,AO 团队的推荐特征,如共同的医疗和社会保健管理,将预测在 AO 客户计划的第一年减少住院治疗,以及整个英格兰相关的结果。

方法

采用两阶段设计:对英格兰 186 个“独立”AO 团队中的 100 个进行分层抽样,并对每个团队的患者进行系统抽样,对黑人和少数民族患者进行分层。从团队收集团队特征、治疗和结果数据。分析考虑了患者的病史、聚类和少数民族的过度抽样。

结果

在 ACT 下,入院后在医院花费的时间比例减少。在 9 个月内,只有 3/1096 名患者失踪。尽管患者的病史显著预测了结果,但几乎没有团队特征预测了 1 年和 3 年后的再次入院或其他患者结果。只有共同管理的团队上,少数民族患者更有可能只接受强制性命令(P = 0.030)。多学科团队和不在工作时间内工作的团队显著预测患者将接受心理干预,但只有 17%的抽样患者接受了此类治疗。

结论

AO 团队的特征不能解释长期的患者结果。由于推荐的团队特征无效,应开发新的护理模式并测试护理过程。管理团队实施基于证据的心理干预可能会改善结果。

相似文献

1
Predicting outcome of assertive outreach across England.预测英格兰果断外展的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):313-22. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0338-4. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
2
Predictors of outcomes of assertive outreach teams: a 3-year follow-up study in North East England.主张性外展团队结果的预测因素:英格兰东北部的一项 3 年随访研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;46(6):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0211-5. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
3
The replacement of assertive outreach services by reinforcing local community teams: a four-year observational study.用强化地方社区团队来取代坚定的外展服务:一项为期四年的观察性研究。
J Ment Health. 2018 Feb;27(1):4-9. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1139073. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Characteristics of teams, staff and patients: associations with outcomes of patients in assertive outreach.团队、工作人员及患者的特征:与积极外展服务中患者结局的关联
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;185:306-11. doi: 10.1192/bjp.185.4.306.
5
A dismantling study of assertive outreach services: comparing activity and outcomes following replacement with the FACT model.一项果断外展服务的拆解研究:在替换为 FACT 模型后比较活动和结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0602-x. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
6
A comparison of the implementation of assertive community treatment in Melbourne, Australia and London, England.比较澳大利亚墨尔本和英国伦敦实施的坚定社区治疗。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Jun;20(2):151-61. doi: 10.1017/s2045796011000230.
7
Assertive outreach teams in London: patient characteristics and outcomes. Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part 3.伦敦的积极外展团队:患者特征与治疗结果。泛伦敦积极外展研究,第3部分。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;183:148-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.2.148.
8
Maintaining contact with people with severe mental illness: 5-year follow-up of assertive outreach.与严重精神疾病患者保持联系:积极外展服务的5年随访
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 Sep;36(9):444-7. doi: 10.1007/s001270170022.
9
North Birmingham assertive outreach evaluation. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.北伯明翰积极外展服务评估。患者特征与临床结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;40(12):988-93. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0989-8. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
10
End of the road for treatment-as-usual studies?常规治疗研究之路走到尽头了吗?
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):5-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062968.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of hospital admission rates for psychiatric patients cared for by multidisciplinary outreach teams with and without peer specialist: a retrospective cohort study of Japanese Outreach Model Project 2011-2014.有和没有同伴专家的多学科外展团队护理的精神病患者住院率比较:2011 - 2014年日本外展模式项目的回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e019090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019090.
2
Receipt and targeting of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people living with psychoses: findings from the second Australian national survey of psychosis.基于证据的心理社会干预措施在精神病患者中的接受和实施情况:来自第二次澳大利亚全国精神病学调查的结果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):613-629. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000288. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The HRT controversy: observational studies and RCTs fall in line.激素替代疗法争议:观察性研究与随机对照试验达成一致。
Lancet. 2009 Apr 11;373(9671):1233-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60708-X.
2
Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression.使用强化个案管理以缩短重症精神疾病患者的住院时间:系统评价与Meta回归分析
BMJ. 2007 Aug 18;335(7615):336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39251.599259.55. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
3
Crisis resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England.
Predictors of Clinical Outcome of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in a Rural Area in Denmark: An Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)临床结局的预测因素:一项为期两年随访的观察性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):908-913. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9908-y. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
4
Community outreach for patients who have difficulties in maintaining contact with mental health services: longitudinal retrospective study of the Japanese outreach model project.针对难以与心理健康服务机构保持联系的患者的社区外展服务:日本外展模式项目的纵向回顾性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 18;14:311. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0311-y.
5
Engagement in assertive community treatment as experienced by recovering clients with severe mental illness and concurrent substance use.康复期伴有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的患者对积极社区治疗的体验。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Oct 31;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-40. eCollection 2014.
6
The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial.《 对于有严重精神疾病的老年患者,采用坚定的社区治疗的效果:一项随机对照试验》
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 15;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-42.
7
A dismantling study of assertive outreach services: comparing activity and outcomes following replacement with the FACT model.一项果断外展服务的拆解研究:在替换为 FACT 模型后比较活动和结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;48(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0602-x. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
英国的危机解决/居家治疗团队与精神科住院率
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;189:441-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020362.
4
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.REACT研究:伦敦北部积极社区治疗的随机评估。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
5
Assertive outreach teams in London: models of operation. Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part 1.伦敦的积极外展团队:运作模式。泛伦敦积极外展研究,第1部分。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;183:132-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.2.132.
6
Randomized clinical trials, developmental theory, and antisocial youth: guidelines for research.随机临床试验、发展理论与反社会青年:研究指南
Dev Psychopathol. 2002 Fall;14(4):695-711. doi: 10.1017/s0954579402004030.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Psychol Med. 2002 Apr;32(3):383-401. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702005299.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Effectiveness of intensive treatment in severe mental illness.强化治疗在严重精神疾病中的有效性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 May;176:492-3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.5.492.
10
PRiSM Psychosis Study. Design limitations, questionable conclusions.棱镜精神病研究。设计局限性,结论存疑。
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;175:501-3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.6.501.