• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Considerations and challenges for planning a public health approach to asthma.规划以公共卫生方法应对哮喘的考虑因素和挑战。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-29. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9515-8.
2
Assessing community-based approaches to asthma control: the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.评估基于社区的哮喘控制方法:美国城市哮喘控制项目
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9480-2.
3
Conceptual framework of the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.美国城市哮喘控制项目的概念框架。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9473-1.
4
Building a partnership with health plans: the Minneapolis and St. Paul Controlling Asthma in American Cities Experience.与健康计划建立伙伴关系:美国城市明尼阿波利斯和圣保罗控制哮喘的经验
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):126-9. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9519-4.
5
A model-driven approach to qualitatively assessing the added value of community coalitions.一种基于模型的方法,用于定性评估社区联盟的增值。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):130-43. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9520-y.
6
Family and home asthma services across the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.美国家庭哮喘控制项目中的家庭和家庭哮喘服务。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):100-12. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9472-2.
7
Controlling Asthma in American Cities: major themes, persistent challenges, and next steps.美国城市中的哮喘控制:主要主题、持续挑战及后续步骤
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9474-0.
8
The Inner-City Asthma Intervention tool kit: best practices and lessons learned.城市中心哮喘干预工具包:最佳实践与经验教训
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Jul;97(1 Suppl 1):S36-9. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60784-3.
9
Community Asthma Initiative to Improve Health Outcomes and Reduce Disparities Among Children with Asthma.社区哮喘倡议:改善哮喘儿童的健康状况并减少差异
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):11-20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6501a4.
10
Coalition-building: the promise of government.建立联盟:政府的承诺。
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):285-91. doi: 10.1023/A:1010386915400.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlling Asthma in American Cities: major themes, persistent challenges, and next steps.美国城市中的哮喘控制:主要主题、持续挑战及后续步骤
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9474-0.
2
Conceptual framework of the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.美国城市哮喘控制项目的概念框架。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9473-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a community-wide asthma intervention on appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids.社区范围哮喘干预对吸入性皮质类固醇合理使用的影响。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):144-55. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9476-y.
2
Asthma friendly pharmacies: a model to improve communication and collaboration among pharmacists, patients, and healthcare providers.哮喘友好型药店:一种改善药师、患者和医疗保健提供者之间沟通与协作的模式。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-25. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9514-9.
3
Conceptual framework of the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project.美国城市哮喘控制项目的概念框架。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9473-1.
4
Lessons learned in using hospital discharge data for state and national public health surveillance: implications for Centers for Disease Control and prevention tracking program.利用医院出院数据进行州和国家公共卫生监测的经验教训:对疾病控制与预防中心追踪项目的启示
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):533-42. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000338365.66704.7d.
5
Effects of asthma education on children's use of acute care services: a meta-analysis.哮喘教育对儿童急性护理服务利用情况的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):575-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0113.
6
National surveillance for asthma--United States, 1980-2004.美国1980 - 2004年哮喘病国家监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Oct 19;56(8):1-54.
7
Breathing easier.呼吸更顺畅。
AHIP Cover. 2007 May-Jun;48(3):50-2, 54, 56 passim.
8
Outcome measures for asthma disease management.哮喘疾病管理的结局指标。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jun;7(3):231-5. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32814a5583.
9
Asthma prevalence in Hispanic and Asian American ethnic subgroups: results from the California Healthy Kids Survey.西班牙裔和亚裔美国人亚组中的哮喘患病率:来自加利福尼亚健康儿童调查的结果。
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e363-70. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2687.
10
The effect of acute and chronic asthma severity on pediatric emergency department utilization.急慢性哮喘严重程度对儿科急诊科就诊率的影响。
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4 Pt 2):S86-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2000F.

规划以公共卫生方法应对哮喘的考虑因素和挑战。

Considerations and challenges for planning a public health approach to asthma.

机构信息

American Lung Association in California, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-29. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9515-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11524-010-9515-8
PMID:21286828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3042076/
Abstract

Addressing asthma from a public health perspective is a relatively new concept for which the literature provides little guidance. A public health approach seeks to decrease the burden of asthma and improve health outcomes at the population level, such as communities, cities, or states, by reaching large numbers of individuals with effective interventions and at reasonable cost. Projects designed to achieve a measureable impact at the population level are fundamentally different from projects or interventions designed to improve outcomes among individuals. This paper uses the experience of the Controlling Asthma in American Cities Project and a review of the relevant literature to explore some of the unique questions and considerations that are implicit when planning large-scale asthma projects intended to improve population outcomes. The paper is intended to inform decision making by local and state government agencies, managed care organizations, health systems, community coalitions, and funders. Analysis of asthma and other chronic disease projects aiming to achieve population-level impact is an area for continued public health research.

摘要

从公共卫生的角度来解决哮喘问题,这是一个相对较新的概念,文献对此提供的指导很少。公共卫生方法旨在通过为大量人群提供有效的干预措施并以合理的成本来减轻哮喘负担,并改善人群层面的健康结果,例如社区、城市或州。旨在对人群层面产生可衡量影响的项目,与旨在改善个体结果的项目或干预措施有着根本的不同。本文利用《美国城市哮喘控制项目》的经验以及对相关文献的回顾,探讨了在规划旨在改善人群结果的大规模哮喘项目时所隐含的一些独特问题和考虑因素。本文旨在为地方和州政府机构、管理式医疗组织、卫生系统、社区联盟和资助者提供决策信息。旨在实现人群层面影响的哮喘和其他慢性病项目的分析,是公共卫生研究的一个持续领域。