Department of Oral Biology, University of Cannecticut Health Center, 06032, Farmington, Connecticut.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Jan;4(1):75-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03213258.
Dichotic CV syllables (identical and nonidentical pairs) were presented at nine temporal offsets between 0 and 500 msec. One task consisted in judging quickly whether the syllables in a pair were phonetically the same or different; the other task was to identify both syllables. The fundamental frequency (pitch) of the synthetic stimuli was either the same or different, and either predictable or unpredictable. The pitch variable had surprisingly little effect on the latencies of "same"-"different" judgments, and the expected "preparation" effect of pitch predictability was ba]rely present. Instead, there were strong effects on the frequencies of errors at short temporal delays, which suggests shifts or biases in the phonetic "same"-"different" criterion with context. A comparison with analogous errors in the identification task revealed identical patterns. Further analysis of identification errors showed no overall "feature sharing advantage": The direction of this effect depends on the kind of error committed. Also, a lag effect was found only in nonidentical pairs that received two identical responses. The results are discussed in the framework of a two-stage information-processing model. Effects of pitch are tentatively explained as biases from implicit (pitch) decisions at the auditory level on phonetic decisions in the presence of uncertainty. Four sources of errors are identified: fusion at the auditory level; "integration," confusions, and transpositions at the phonetic level.
双听 CV 音节(相同和不同的音节对)在 0 到 500 毫秒之间的 9 个时间偏移处呈现。一个任务是快速判断一对音节的发音是否相同或不同;另一个任务是识别两个音节。合成刺激的基频(音高)要么相同,要么不同,要么可预测,要么不可预测。音高变量对“相同”-“不同”判断的潜伏期影响不大,音高可预测性的预期“准备”效应几乎不存在。相反,在短时间延迟处,错误的频率有很强的影响,这表明在语境中,语音“相同”-“不同”标准会发生转移或偏差。与识别任务中的类似错误进行比较,发现了相同的模式。对识别错误的进一步分析表明,没有总体的“特征共享优势”:这种效应的方向取决于所犯的错误类型。此外,仅在接收两个相同响应的非相同对中发现了滞后效应。在两阶段信息处理模型的框架内讨论了结果。音高的影响被暂时解释为在存在不确定性的情况下,听觉水平上的隐含(音高)决策对语音决策的偏差。确定了四个错误源:听觉水平上的融合;语音水平上的“整合”、混淆和转换。