Suppr超能文献

双耳分听中的刺激优势

Stimulus dominance in dichotic listening.

作者信息

Speaks C, Carney E, Niccum N, Johnson C

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Sep;24(3):430-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2403.430.

Abstract

Twenty-four listeners received 20 dichotic-listening runs of natural stop-vowel syllables. Listeners marked two responses for each of 30 pairs of syllables per run, which yielded 480 pairs of responses for each of the 30 pairs of syllables. The principal analysis focused on "stimulus dominance" wherein a significantly higher score occurs for one of the competing syllables in a pair regardless of the ear to which that syllable is presented. With 30 pairs of syllables, there were 15 possible instances of stimulus dominance; 11 were observed. The voicing feature was contrasted for 9 of the 15 pairs. Seven of those pairs resulted in significantly higher scores (dominance) for the voiceless stop than for the voiced, one resulted in a higher score for the voiced member of the pair, and for one pair the scores for the two members were essentially the same. Stimulus dominance cannot, however, be characterized sufficiently as a dominance of voiceless over voiced stops; three of the six pairs in which voicing was shared also produced significant stimulus dominance. Stimulus dominance for a given pair of syllables may interact with, and in some cases override, the ear advantage. Of the 30 pairs of syllables, 11 produced a significant right ear advantage (REA), 9 produced a significant left ear advantage (LEA), and for 10 pairs the ear advantage was not significantly different from zero. For a specific pair of syllables, the direction of ear with, and in some cases override, the ear advantage. Of the 30 pairs of syllables, 11 produced a significant right ear advantage (REA), 9 produced a significant left ear advantage (LEA), and for 10 pairs the ear advantage was not significantly different from zero. For a specific pair of syllables, the direction of ear with, and in some cases override, the ear advantage. Of the 30 pairs of syllables, 11 produced a significant right ear advantage (REA), 9 produced a significant left ear advantage (LEA), and for 10 pairs the ear advantage was not significantly different from zero. For a specific pair of syllables, the direction of ear advantage usually corresponded to the ear that received the dominant syllable.

摘要

24名听众收听了20组自然的塞音-元音音节的双耳分听测试。每位听众在每次测试的30对音节中,每对音节都要做出两种反应,这就使得30对音节中的每一对都产生了480对反应。主要分析集中在“刺激优势”上,即在一对相互竞争的音节中,无论该音节呈现给哪只耳朵,其中一个音节的得分显著更高。30对音节中,有15种可能出现刺激优势的情况;观察到11种。在这15对中的9对中对清浊音特征进行了对比。其中7对中,清塞音的得分显著高于浊塞音(表现出优势),1对中浊音成员得分更高,还有1对中两个成员的得分基本相同。然而,刺激优势不能简单地被描述为清塞音对浊塞音的优势;在6对清浊音相同的音节对中,有3对也产生了显著的刺激优势。对于给定的一对音节,刺激优势可能与耳优势相互作用,在某些情况下会覆盖耳优势。30对音节中,11对表现出显著的右耳优势(REA),9对表现出显著的左耳优势(LEA),10对的耳优势与零无显著差异。对于特定的一对音节,耳优势的方向通常与接收优势音节的耳朵相对应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验