Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 85281, Tempe, Arizona.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Sep;4(5):532-40. doi: 10.3758/BF03213215.
Word and category recognition was investigated in the context of other stimuli, where the semantic distance relationships among the stimuli were derived from multidimensional scaling. On each trial, three horizontal strings of letters were presented. In the word condition, a positive response was required when the three strings formed three words; in the category condition, a positive response was required when the three strings formed words belonging to the same category. The results indicated that: (a) category decisions take about 150-200 msec longer than do word decisions, (b) word decisions are facilitated by a common categorical membership but semantic distances within the category are relatively unimportant, and (c)within-category semantic distances systematically altered response time for the category condition. It was hypothesized that semantic distance relationships may be sensitized for categorical decisions, but that only large semantic distances function effectively for word decisions.
在其他刺激的背景下研究了单词和类别识别,其中刺激之间的语义距离关系来自多维尺度分析。在每次试验中,呈现三个水平的字母串。在单词条件下,当三个字符串形成三个单词时需要做出积极的反应;在类别条件下,当三个字符串形成属于同一类别的单词时需要做出积极的反应。结果表明:(a)类别决策比单词决策长约 150-200 毫秒;(b)单词决策受到共同的类别成员身份的促进,但类别内的语义距离相对不重要;(c)类别内的语义距离系统地改变了类别条件下的反应时间。假设语义距离关系可能对类别决策敏感,但只有大的语义距离对单词决策有效。