Suppr超能文献

在情景记忆识别和词汇判断任务中,分离性词频与加工水平的交互作用。

A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.

作者信息

Duchek J M, Neely J H

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):148-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03197065.

Abstract

The effects of levels-of-processing and word frequency were directly compared in three different memory tests. In the episodic recognition test, the subjects decided whether or not a word or a pronounceable nonword had been previously studied. In the two lexical decision tests with either pronounceable or unpronounceable nonwords as distractors, the subjects decided whether a test item was a word or a nonword. There were four main results: (1) in all three tests, reaction times (RTs) in response to studied words were faster if they had received semantic rather than rhyme processing during study; (2) in the episodic recognition test, RTs were faster for low- than for high-frequency words; in both lexical decision tests, RTs were faster for high- than for low-frequency words, though less so when the nonword distractors were unpronounceable; (3) prior study facilitated lexical decisions more in response to low- than to high-frequency words, thereby attenuating the word-frequency effect, but more so when the nonword distractors were pronounceable; (4) in the lexical decision test with pronounceable nonword distractors, relative to prior rhyme processing, prior semantic processing facilitated performance more for high- than for low-frequency words, whereas the opposite was the case in the episodic recognition test. Discussion focused on the relationship of these results to current views of the mechanisms by which (1) word frequency and depth of processing affect performance in implicit and explicit memory tests, and (2) repetition priming attenuates word-frequency effects for lexical decisions.

摘要

在三项不同的记忆测试中,直接比较了加工水平和词频的影响。在情景识别测试中,受试者要判断一个单词或一个可发音的非单词之前是否被学习过。在两项词汇判断测试中,分别以可发音或不可发音的非单词作为干扰项,受试者要判断一个测试项目是单词还是非单词。有四个主要结果:(1)在所有三项测试中,如果在学习过程中单词接受了语义加工而非韵律加工,那么对学习过的单词的反应时间(RTs)会更快;(2)在情景识别测试中,低频词的反应时间比高频词更快;在两项词汇判断测试中,高频词的反应时间比低频词更快,不过当非单词干扰项不可发音时,这种差异较小;(3)先前的学习对低频词的词汇判断促进作用比对高频词更大,从而减弱了词频效应,但当非单词干扰项可发音时,这种情况更明显;(4)在以可发音的非单词作为干扰项的词汇判断测试中,相对于先前的韵律加工,先前的语义加工对高频词的表现促进作用比对低频词更大,而在情景识别测试中情况则相反。讨论集中在这些结果与当前观点的关系上,即(1)词频和加工深度如何影响内隐和外显记忆测试中的表现,以及(2)重复启动如何减弱词汇判断中的词频效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验