University of Alberta, T6G 2El, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 1975 Mar;3(2):143-59. doi: 10.3758/BF03212891.
Several sources of interference in memory are identified. These sources may be grossly classified as processing interference, i.e., that due to disruption of whatever activity occurs during the input or output of to-be-remembered material, or trace interaction, i.e., that due to interference among the stored memories themselves. The latter would appear to be due to simultaneous activation of correct and incorrect associations mediated by confusion among cue stimuli. A consideration of the means by which interference is reduced suggests that interfering associates are not weakened, unlearned, or suppressed except possibly when nominal stimuli are identical and sets of target and interfering items are temporally discriminable. Discriminative encoding of cue stimuli may eliminate these associations, if it operates at the perceptual level. Otherwise, potential interfering associates are activated, but may be rendered functionally impotent by discriminating them from correct associations on the basis of either backward association with discriminative stimulus attributes or differential contextual attributes such as frequency, time, order, and strength.
识别出了几种干扰记忆的来源。这些来源可以大致分为处理干扰,即由于输入或输出待记忆材料过程中的任何活动的中断而导致的干扰,或者痕迹干扰,即由于存储的记忆本身之间的干扰而导致的干扰。后者似乎是由于在线索刺激之间的混淆中介导的正确和错误联想的同时激活。对干扰减少的手段的考虑表明,干扰联想不会被削弱、遗忘或抑制,除非名义刺激相同,并且目标和干扰项目的集合在时间上可区分。如果线索刺激的辨别性编码在知觉水平上起作用,它可能会消除这些联想。否则,潜在的干扰联想被激活,但可能通过基于与辨别性刺激属性的后向联想或差异上下文属性(如频率、时间、顺序和强度)将它们与正确联想区分开来,从而使它们在功能上变得无能为力。